Dear Alexey,

>From our current (but also mid-term future perspective) referring to the Table 
>2 in BT.2020-2 (see https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-BT.2020-2-201510-I/en ) 
>would be more than sufficient.
Certainly due to associated complexity, for now we may want to limit the frame 
rates requirement above 60fps to be only supported let's say for up to 1080p 
resolution, since we're already listing:

| 2160p (4K),3840x2160 |  24, 25, 30, 48, 50, 60 |       RA       |

and the codec levels in the Table 6 already much higher than that?

Alternatively, any frame-rate higher than 60fps could be placed into the 
section 3.2.1 as an optional requirement.

Best regards,

Andrew


From: Filippov Alexey [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 4:30 AM
To: [email protected]; Krupiczka, Andrew; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; Adam Roach; Zhoujiantong; Jose Alvarez
Subject: Re: Re: [video-codec] Call for review comments: 
draft-ietf-netvc-requirements

Dear Mr. Coppa, dear Mr. Krupiczka,

Thank you for your valuable comments! Is my understanding correct that you want 
to keep fractional frame-rates just for IPTV/OTT/VoD applications? Could you 
please specify a set of such fractional frame-rates that you would like to 
include into draft-ietf-netvc-requirements?

Thank you in advance!

--
Best regards,
Alexey Filippov
_______________________________________________
video-codec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec

Reply via email to