On Monday 04 March 2002 02:08 am, you wrote: > > That does not make sense. Someone who wants to program video > > application should be able to get a reasonably full idea of what is > > necessary from api documentation available for the system they are > > programming for. > > What exactly is bad with the v4l2 specs? There is a detailed > description of all formats at http://www.thedirks.org/v4l2/v4l2fmt.htm > > Gerd
Gerd, you are correct that they are documented very well. I was complaining about the fact that the definitions for the V4l2 pixel formats have very little to in common with the way that the xvideo extensions defines them. Since it is at least somewhat logical to display captured video using xvideo, it would be nice if there was a bit of linking. And this may be pie in the sky, because I don't know about how dma transfers work and the such, but it would be super sweet if you could get shared memory from X windows to use with the xvideo extension, and then get the capture card to capture straight to those buffers. I realize that it would only cut out a little bit (one memcpy per display), but it would still be sweet. Would that be possible? Chris _______________________________________________ Video4linux-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
