Alan Cox wrote: >>But now I hear from two different sides: "we're going to do things >>completely different", and that ticks me off. "Not now, please!" And >>frankly, IMO the V4L1.1 changes don't add much value. >> > >IMHO For 2.4 if it needs driver updating to keep compatible its a bad idea. > It doesn't. The function pointers in struct video_device that were removed in the 2.5 patch are retained in the 2.4 patch. Current 2.4 drivers should work without modification.
-- Mark McClelland [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Video4linux-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
