Hello all, I recently had an interesting discussion with someone who claimed that videodevX from Bill Dirks is the official v4l2 version...
So, IMHO the informations on Bill Dirk's are quite misleading regarding the v4l2 version that made it into the kernel now finally. And people are still reading it... Additionally, no current v4l2 modules are available as a standalone package to compile for 2.4.x, like videodevX used to be. Because of this, I made a backport of the 2.5.x. v4l2 modules for my own usage... So what are we going to do about this? Some proposals: 1) Delete all occurunces regarding videodevX et.al. from the official web page, and instead provide a backport of the 2.5.x driver. If this is ok, I assume that nobody has time for this, so I volunteer for this job. (Yes, you heard it right. Bill can you contact me in private in case everybody agrees?) 2) Clean up the other pages, mainly the Peoples & Projects. (I'll do this, too, check the links etc.) 3) What about the API documentation? Did anybody did a review? Michael Schimek perhaps? Comments are very welcome. Bill, what do you think about it? If Bill is "Out of business", we could perhaps put the "new" docs and page to bytesex.org. Gerd? CU Michael. -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
