Problem is, I've got drivers that need to be ported (about 4).  Should
I try porting v4l2-cc.[ch] to work with videodevX?

Are there some instructions for weaning these drivers away from
v4l2-cc.[ch]?

Thanks,

Chris

Justin Schoeman wrote:
> 
> Chris Worley wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to upgrade some old V4L2 device drivers to 2.4 (looking at
> > http://bttv-v4l2.sourceforge.net/download/videodevX-061000.tgz ).
> >
> > I'm noticing that the v4l2-cc.[ch] files are not used anymore.
> >
> > What happened?  Is there any documentation that describes the changes
> > that need to be made to rid yourself of dependence on these files?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Chris
> 
> When you upgrade to bttv2 + videodevX the dependancies to v4l2-cc go
> away (you may have to remove the old v4l2-cc and videodev files).  The
> v4l2-cc system was a much more elegant way of handling the bttv
> subsystems, but due to the masses of cards out there it became
> hopelessly impractical to maintain the two separate access methods.
> 
> (If anybody wants to reintegrate and maintain the v4l2-cc subsystem,
> feel free!)
> 
> -justin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Video4linux-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list



_______________________________________________
Video4linux-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list

Reply via email to