> Hmm, remove all the function pointers from struct video_device and replace > them with a struct file_operations, then make the videodev functions simply > pass throuth stuff untouched? What about backward compatibility? Provide a videodev_simple_fops structure with the old behaviour that people can use as the fops to register ? _______________________________________________ Video4linux-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
- Re: [V4L] races in v4l read + write in 2.4 Oliver Neukum
- Re: [V4L] races in v4l read + write in 2.4 Alan Cox
- Re: [V4L] races in v4l read + write in 2.4 Michel Lanners
- Re: [V4L] races in v4l read + write in 2.4 Jeff Garzik
- Re: [V4L] races in v4l read + write in 2.4 Jeff Garzik
- [V4L] PATCH: file_operations for videodev Jeff Garzik
- Re: [V4L] races in v4l read + write in 2.4 Alan Cox
- Re: [V4L] races in v4l read + write in 2.4 Gerd Knorr
- Re: [V4L] races in v4l read + write in 2.4 Alan Cox
- Re: [V4L] races in v4l read + write in 2.4 Gerd Knorr
- Re: [V4L] races in v4l read + write in 2.4 Alan Cox
- Re: [V4L] races in v4l read + write in 2.4 Oliver Neukum
- Re: [V4L] races in v4l read + write in 2.4 Oliver Neukum
