let me guess, you have been hanging out at Forum 3000 alot lately...
Tobias - "The only person on the v4l mailing list compatible with
Reason(tm)"
>From: "Tobias Gogolin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [V4L] Blasphemous Ignorance ?
>Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:12:03 -0800
>
> > insinuating that he's been detrimental to V4L is um... pretty misguided.
>
>? detrimental
>
>I never Implied anything like that
>No it is great that the little 'prueba' in Question has made it so far
>And its true mine was not the purest 'Righteous' approach
>
>And no I am coding Java all day but I forgot even how to read C - Sorry :(
>
>And to make it more livable lets file this under
>
> ;P (8 Plasfemos PigNoRantz :)
>
>Yes when I first thought about mentioning it I thought it was funny :)
>
>Blasphemous implies that our work is before the Greater Oneness
>We are creating our technical Soul the evolving media of communication
>Something maybe not as enduring as Pyramids but Awe-inspiring when it works
>!
>
>======================================================
>
>To top it all it is my Own Ignorance to not grab these things so Quickly
>And wanting to find it all prepared for me
>At the end there wouldn't be anything special to the Implementations I am
>offering
>I once wrote a request for someone to help me with a w3cam issue too
>- had the machine running for days with this nice remote configurable .pl
>Nobody replied (didn't check any logs) Maybe nobody tried - Certainly
>nobody advised me if I need to configure some .xyz file I
>don't know about
>The whole V4L thing is a very very Black Box to me
>I want to be Enlightened - I am working on great visions of making it
>easier to automatically generate visual code explorers - Cause
>I know there will always be code and the more cody it is the more efficient
>(at times)
>But for a Human (that doesn't want to dedicate his live to just one detail)
>it is important to provide a friendly interface and/or
>fair documentation...
>
>What preprogrammed this thread is also the documentation (may it was an old
>one I remembered reading) And being of German Origin
>myself I do Understand B]
>
>So don't take it without my full Compassion - Landsman Gerd ?
>
>So V4L is a Char Device - offering its outputstream after sending a
>sequence of incantation structures
>is this file xAwTv was missing necessary also for w3cam or videodog ?
>Are there any Fast and Pure WhitePapers on it ?
>
>Linux is a miracle to me. The programmers are being looked up to as Higher
>beings - for their creative potential its well deserved -
>A Programmer to enter this realm by having given live to an organism that
>is in demand and becomes part of the multiplying pools of
>this Fractal Netscape - and even more if in self-less fashion enters the
>code as open to the million fingers of evolution extending
>its live-expecance and making it part of the greater construct the virtual
>building through which so many walk - making it more of a
>reality even if it is an escape from reality ?
>
>My work is nothing special - hard to find a single thing that you could use
>every day ...
>its at http://ultra.ens.uabc.mx/jws
>Is a product of research and a little teaching of simple Java
>I am hoping I finish something presentable soon !
>till then forgive my Blasphemous Ignorance!
>
>yours truely
>
>Tobias
>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://zapping.sourceforge.net/
> Looks very sexy and - I am still waiting on a very slow loading Glibc 2.2
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Eric Sandeen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 19:55
>Subject: Re: [V4L] Blasphemous Ignorance ?
>
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > Which Program might I be talking about ???
> > >
> > > I don't know. Don't leave us in suspense, what the hell are you
>talking
> > > about?
> >
> > Pretty sure he's talking about xawtv, but swiping at Gerd and
> > insinuating that he's been detrimental to V4L is um... pretty misguided.
> >
> > Tobias wrote:
> > > I feel insulted...
> >
> > I doubt you're the only one. :)
> >
> > But come on, if you know Java, surely you know enough C to implement a
> > "save selected options as default" button and be done with it. That'd
> > be a bit more productive, wouldn't it?
> >
> > (But I do agree that it would be a nice/needed feature...)
> >
> > -Eric
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Video4linux-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Video4linux-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
_______________________________________________
Video4linux-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
