Hi,

I have two implementations of video capture and display using SDL,
and I am trying to figure out the reason for differences in
performance and appearance between them.  Everything here is
using the V4L2 driver for Videum boards.

Implementation 1: Native DirectFB

Primary Surface in video memory.
Secondary surface in system memory.
Control loop:
  - grab video frame, copy it into secondary surface.
  - image process the data in the secondary surface.
  - Stretched blit of secondary surface into primary surface.
Code timing show that I am churning through 30fps,
though I don't think that this is the rate at which
frames are actually appearing on the screen
(maybe frames are being clobbered between refreshes?)


Implementation 2: Over SDL over DirectFB
(modelled using the effectv code).

Control loop
  - grab video frame, bring it into system memory.
  - stretch it by pixel doubling using the CPU.
  - copy data into primary SDL surface.
Code timing show that I am churning through 21 fps,
I think that this is the rate at which frames are
actually appearing on the screen.  (If I don't do
the pixel doubling step, I get 30fps).


Bottom line: implementation 2 looks much smoother on the
screen than implementation 1, and I am trying to figure out
why.  I moved to DirectFB because I am using a Matrox G400
and I figured that on-board stretched blits would be much
faster than CPU-based pixel doubling.  Frame rates show that
the DirectFB implementation chews through frames much faster,
but qualitatively, the SDL over DirectFB implementation looks
much smoother.  I suspect it may be because I am blitting
several frames to the Matrox card before it has a chance to
actually show them to me on the screen--is this possible?

Can someone offer some suggestions--obviously the folks who
wrote the back end of SDL -> DirectFB know how to do it right.

Thanks

Bilal






_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com



_______________________________________________
Video4linux-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list

Reply via email to