|
I guess we could always create another conference and those that were interested could come to that or wait for the next one, or the next one or the next one. Right, it doesnt have to be as big. But something more than a meetup or a transatlatic-BBQ
If you look at the history of this group's correspondence you can read all about the excitement of not just being here and doing it, but setting precedence.
The best thing about this one particular yahoo group, is that it altogether steers in a direction that has proven beneficial for the world as it relates to EVERYTHING we do and when you say so what to that, I say you are just being a devil's advocate with your sharp negation of my every sentence. Lets not get into the spaceship and boats arguments I said already.
Why dont you tell us more specifically why YOU dont want it to happen sooner besides it will be more painful for YOU?
Why is this a bad thing for this movement then?
On Jul 20, 2005, at 12:12 PM, Markus Sandy wrote: andrew,
please see responses below
andrew michael baron wrote: The logic of doing it sooner is that I'm worried we'll be squished.
I figured that much. But this is not logic, it is fear.
If we dont work harder and faster, we will be swept up entirely.
The major media, the FCC, world trade, everyone is seeing whats going
on.
In less than 2 months you'll have Apple pushing CBS video thru RSS
enclosures and the media writing stories about HOllywood broadcast
producers like the self-fufilling trademarking VJ guy.
The news, methods, procedures, legalities, tools, will be elsewhere. . .
Potentially.
so what?
Sorry Verdi, but one day you may very well be stopped for doing what
you do online.
How so? You are fear mongering here.
I'm just saying I'm finding that we as a group, we as humans, we as a
movement can move faster.
I agree,but what does that have to do with the time and place for getting together?
It would be more fun.
I'm having a blast as it is and things haven't even got going yet. :)
I get that it would be more fun for you.
How would it be more fun for the rest of us?
What is it specifically about having a Vloggercon that *you* want so much?
What are your specific motives and expectations here?
What is it that must be done in person so soon?
We would get to meet again sooner in the Fall and then again next
summer.
so have a meetup in the fall - why does it have to be "the meetup"?
It would be easy to pull off.
i think it's easy and hard anytime
We will always overlap other conferences.
admittedly true, except this may be one area where weather is in our favor
obviously most (except furiers) would like to avoid winter in NYC
Some of us will always be able to not make it or have other higher
priorities, this wont change.
agreed, but this is a point for or against any time and place
---
btw, I'm not totally against the idea of a fall meetup as much as i would like to hear some rational reasons as to why not January
So far I'm not hearing any
no offense (in fact with respect), you sound like chicken little saying: "the media is coming!"
what's needed is something more like paul revere
perhaps you sense a tipping point?
is it by land or by sea andrew?
;)
regards,
markus
--
My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us
http://apperceptions.org
http://spinflow.org
http://spinsummer2005.blogspot.com
http://spinsummer2005meetup.blogspot.com
http://vloggercuewest.blogspot.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--
My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us
http://apperceptions.org
http://spinflow.org
http://spinsummer2005.blogspot.com
http://spinsummer2005meetup.blogspot.com
http://vloggercuewest.blogspot.com
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
