I like to assume the best about people. So when someone has an accusation, I
expect there to be sufficient proof.
>Several of the women in the group have contacted me offline directly and
>told me that someone has reported me to yahoo
>and others as a "spammer" etc.
>Someone on this list is up to their dirty little tricks again. This isnt
>the first person this has >happened to after talking on this list.... I
>just got an email from Cheryl OFF LIST and it went to >my "bulk" folder. I
>mean come on, reporting Cheryl as a spammer to Yahoo-- what kind of
>videobloggers are you?
These statements seemed pretty definite. I am not an email guru and assumed
there was a factual basis for the accusations. I still stand behind the
statement that reporting someone as a spammer just because you disagree with
or dislike them is low. However, in the apparent absence of any proof that
anyone here did that: I profusely apologize for the implication or
assumption that someone did. I apologize. I am sorry. I will try to be more
careful in future.
Now I am turning off the computer.
-David
>From: kinganti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
>To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [videoblogging] videoblogging GROUP home to dirty trickster(s)
>Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:06:12 -0700
>
>are you guys nuts?
>that shit just happens sometimes. every once in a while a machine
>doesn't work perfectly, it jsut happens.
>
>sometimes an email from my friends and/or family will wind up in my spam
>box.
>
>shit happens.
>
>and believe it or NOT. everyone once in a while, i get spam in my inbox.
>
>rumors spread fast in this group.
>
>WHO STARTED the spam reporting rumor? because that is just as lame as
>what the rumor was about.
>
>seriously, folks. im a stoned califnornia kid, and *I* know this.
>whats the deal?
>has everyone gone mad?
>
>On 7/20/05, David Yirchott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I second that, Josh. Anyone who has a problem with Cheryl or anyone
>else in
> > the group should address that person. Like I said in my last email: we
>are
> > like a big family. And like a family, you may not always get along with
> > everyone, but you don't stab them in the back. To go behind someone's
>back
> > and report them as a spammer is low.
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: Josh Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> > >To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> > >Subject: Re: [videoblogging] videoblogging GROUP home to dirty
> > trickster(s)
> > >Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:47:35 -0400
> > >
> > >I would have to agree that if someone did report another member of the
> > >group
> > >as a spammer (if they aren't, as it is in this case) that is pretty
>lame.
> > >
> > >I didn't even know it was possible to do that...but i did notice some
>of
> > >Thomas G Henry's mail going to my spam box...maybe it was because of
>his
> > >lengthy signature...either way that is too bad.
> > >--
> > >Josh Leo
> > >
> > >www.joshleo.com <http://www.joshleo.com>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > Individual Fireant Typepad
> >
> > ________________________________
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >
> > Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
>
>
>--
>http://antidisestablishmentarian.blogspot.com
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
