Re: [videoblogging] Re: business week article

[Randolfe Wicker]

My mistake.  I looked for "Kunga".  I also am use to limits on words (5 character each) and not on characters so I looked for a long piece.   Liked the points you made.  It is just amazing that there are so few comments on articles like this just as there are few comments left by those who view vlogs.  What is it with this consume-without-reacting world in which you might see that something has been viewed 137 times and no one has left even one comment? ----- Original Message ----- From: Kunga To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 6:19 PM Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: business week article we are referring to this article: < http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_36/ b3949087_mz063.htm > My 1000 characters are obvious at the bottom, second in comments.  Nickname: FutureMedia -- Taylor Barcroft, New Media Publisher, Editor-In-Chief, Vidcaster Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley http://FutureMedia.org On Aug 29, 2005, at 12:46 PM, Randolfe Wicker wrote: > I checked out the article today because I wanted to see what you  > said.  There were only about six comments (including my own).  I  > didn't see anything from you.  Maybe, they edit or delete comments  > they don't care for. SPONSORED LINKS Rss reader Fireant Internet directory Individual Free rss reader YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.