On Oct 26, 2005, at 11:12 AM, duncan speakman wrote:
Lets take a look again at your original blab, which I would call very patronizing: "a rocketboom clone? ..erm... you know.. call me crazy but i'm sure i've seen casual presenters sitting there telling us about stuff with a cue sheet in their hand before somewhere, hmm.. i think it might have been called television. rocketboom have a style all of their own, but they certainly didn't create that visual presentation format... any 'trendy' shows on Channel 4 (uk), MTV et al from the late 80s and early nineties... " This was your next response: "lol... there's no need to be patronising andrew, i was only talking about visual content/style.. take away the RSS and the links shown below the video and what do you have? " So you say, there is no need to be patronizing, and yet you patronize? Is this not the presentation of a magician? And to your answer? What is left when you take away the technicalities? If you don't see anything, it just seems like you may be missing some of the tools needed to be able to see.
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Public Eye - West Coast... andrew michael baron
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Public Eye - West ... duncan speakman
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Public Eye - West ... duncan speakman
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Public Eye - W... Richard Bennett-Forrest
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Public Eye... andrew michael baron
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Public... Pete Prodoehl
- [videoblogging] Re: Public Eye - West ... Amanda Congdon
- [videoblogging] Re: Public Eye - West Coas... Irish Hermit
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Public Eye - W... Pete Prodoehl
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Public Eye... Mike Hudack
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Public... Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen