> If you provide a syndication feed of your content, aren't you > already presumably opting in?
Thats my feeling - at least if you're using a cc license it is. On 11/5/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Part of the problem is that they probably can't have their software read > which license is used. Well there is an RSS extension for the cc license I think. I mean ... they COULD ... they just aren't. But all of the 6 mian CC licenses "allows for redistribution". Not Download. "Redistribution". If you put a link to a file on your website you are actively inviting the world to click/download it. Are you not actively inviting the world to syndicate content if you actively provide a syndication feed? (thats not to say those syndicating the content shouldnt be held to ALL terms of the license ... but a feed was made available to them to use as long as they do.) With a CC license you are also (at least usually) "allowing for redistribution". Maybe with a full copyright you could ... ah hell I dunno ... IANAL :-P ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/cd_AJB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/