Our tactic in this regard has been more often to work with others to propose specifications or extensions to existing specifications.
We've been involved with the development of Media RSS, which was a very open process as opposed to the way the iTunes extensions were simply imposed by Apple. We've also been involved with the Microformats community and have often put in suggestions to FeedBurner. I don't like the idea of people having to rewrite their feeds to conform with this service or that. If they conform to the existing standards then they should just work. -Josh On 12/16/05, Christian Wach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 16 Dec 2005, at 20:03, Joshua Kinberg wrote: > > >> Any idea if you'll be implementing a <fireant:blah> namespace? > > > > Tell me what the advantages would be for this? > > Is something not covered by RSS, iTunes extensions, or Media RSS, that > > you think we should include... or try to get included in other specs? > > I'm not saying there would be - it's just that I've spent most of this > week shoring up my WordPress install for proper syndication and I > wondered if I'd have to deal with yet another specification. > > Bests, > > Christian > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> AIDS in India: A "lurking bomb." Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
