By the way it was me who posted this originally.... Leave Enric alone, he's a nice guy.
Paul
On 2 Jan 2006, at 22:37, Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 23:28:15 +0100, Stephanie Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Do yourself a favour and Visit my Vlog
wrote:
> time. Each subsequent offense is worth 10 years, and the rules were
> supposedly retroactive, meaning they could get you for not having
> documentation even before you were required to keep it.
I'd like to call bullshit on that. Democracies have checks in place to
avoid retroactive legislation. As I refuse to believe the USA to have a
system silly enough to allow this kind of legislation I looked it up. And
indeed retroactive legislation is "Prohibited by Article I section 9
(applying to federal law) and section 10 (applying to state law) of the
U.S. Constitution."
<URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retroactive_legislation >
- Andreas, watching FUD at work.
--
<URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
▪ Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
▪ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
▪ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com
It's worth a laugh and work friendly.
