Thanks for the new resources. I had seen the http://www.stormforcepictures.com/howto-getthatfilmlook.php page before but not the others. Great write-ups.
To give you (and perhaps myself) a better sense of what I want the cam for, take a look at the F.E.M. site/project http://www.foureyedmonsters.com/ . That is the documentary style I am hoping for. It is crystal clear (at times); the lighting is tremendous and the angle/shots/cuts are done with effectiveness. It is a combo of in the field and in a "controlled" environment shots that really seem to work. So it may be that I am not looking for the "film" look but rather a cam that can record with sufficient technical quality and that I can "adjust/set" so that I can do whatever I need in the post process. Does any of this makes sense? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Frank Carver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Saturday, January 21, 2006, 12:59:20 PM, Bill Streeter wrote: > > > This is kind of an issue with me. The DVX 100 has 24p but I find 24p > > to be over rated when it comes to getting a "film" look. When people > > talk about getting a "film" look on video they're talking about > > getting a film transfered to video look. > > If you are really interested in getting video to look like it came > from film, there are a whole load of factors you need to take into > consideration. There's too much to cover in a single post here, but I > have collected a bunch of URLs that might help: > > http://www.tvtechnology.com/features/Tech-Corner/f_rf_technology_corner.shtml > > http://www.urbanfox.tv/production/filmlookindex.htm > > http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=432433 Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
