That's right, and Veoh will be releasing the complete works of William Shakespeare in the third quarter this year...
Josh On Apr 8, 2006, at 3:31 PM, David Howell wrote: > <sarcasm> > A room full of monkeys manually searched the internet for videos. > </sarcasm> > > David > http://www.davidhowellstudios.com > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "mikehudack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> There are numerous feeds in Veoh with no subscribers. How did they >> get there? >> >> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, WWWhatsup <joly@> wrote: >> >>> >>> No I don't think it works that way. >>> >>> If you look, f'rinstance, at Ryanne's thing on >>> >> http://veoh.com/videoDetails.html?v=e55696wg9YwjDy >> >>> you'll see he has 1 subscriber. >>> >>> That would be the person who submitted the feed, so that their VEOH >>> >> client would automatically >> >>> download it as and when the RSS updates.. >>> >>> Only Ryanne has the option to add an identifier to his feed and thus >>> >> claim ownership >> >>> of the feed and customize it as he sees fit, deleting episodes, or, >>> >> I presume, >> >>> blocking it entirely, if he should wish to. >>> >>> I think the omission of permalink URL's etc is more likely down to >>> >> VEOH focusing on >> >>> the video and P2P distro aspects. In most TV applications the video >>> >> content >> >>> speaks for itself. They do give the associated text. I am sure >>> >> they'll fix this. >> >>> >>> I took the trouble to claim my feed. You'll notice looking at the >>> >> details >> >>> http://veoh.com/seriesDetails.html?s=s2644 >>> that it links to my info, another page that has my URL etc. And that >>> >> also I take the trouble >> >>> to include the permalinks in the associated text. >>> >>> I think the 'unclaimed feature' is intrinsic to the secondary VEOH >>> >> concept of >> >>> an aggregator that enables P2P propagation, but since that arrived >>> >> after their >> >>> primary concept of direct video publishing via P2P, they haven't >>> >> thought >> >>> through all the issues, perhaps. Adding the ability for users to >>> >> subscribe to 3rd party >> >>> RSS feeds was an afterthought.. >>> >>> Then, with the rise of YouTube etc, they have scrambled to provide >>> >> similar flv >> >>> functionality for their publishers. >>> >>> joly >>> >>> >>> >>> At 04:46 PM 4/8/2006, you wrote: >>> >>>> hi joly, >>>> >>>> if you upload a feed to Veoh, it is my understanding that the feed >>>> >> will fall under the name of the user submitting the feed. it will be >> "claimed" by them. unclaimed feeds have gotten into the system >> through >> means of automation. that's why they are not affiliated with any Veoh >> user. instead of a user name, you see the name of the vlog (eg: >> kitykity's vlog) or hosting service the feed was taken from. i doubt >> there is a user on Veoh called <http://blip.tv>blip.tv. >> >>>> >>>> i like the idea of being able to make and distribute large files >>>> >> via a service like Veoh. that's great. i don't like the unclaimed >> feed >> "feature". >> >>>> >>>> ---------- >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> WWWhatsup NYC >>> http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >> >> > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________ "Don't hate the media, become the media."- Jello Biafra Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
