On 4/9/06, Andreas Haugstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:23:15 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now please note that I do NOT know if any vlogger is using HTTP
> "no-cache"
> header or not. And I do NOT how if Veoh is respecting the HTTP
> "no-cache"
> header or not. Just trying to give everyone a perspetive on the
> technology
> side of things. (One note though. If you do specify the "no-cache"
> header,
> then your site will be ALOT slower. Letting others cache things speeds
> things up alot more than you probably realize. If anyone wants an
> explaination of how this works, let me know, and I'll provide it.)
HTTP cacheing is storing with the intent of optimizing subsequent requests
to the same resource. It doesn't apply in this case.
The HTTP "no-cache" header has gained a legal context also. I remember reading about multiple court cases where this was perpetuated; both in Canadian and USA court. (I don't have any links, but I'm pretty sure I read this, via various court cases, from the EFF website. So if I or someone else did enough digging, the exact court cases could be found.)
See ya
--
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
charles @ reptile.ca
supercanadian @ gmail.com
developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
___________________________________________________________________________
Make Television http://maketelevision.com/
SPONSORED LINKS
| Fireant | Individual | Use |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
