On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:41:50 +0200, Devlon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was interpretting the 'translation' part of the definition. I > understood > (incorrectly maybe) that a translation was a derivative. Isn't > transcoding > a translation? Okay, I don't know about US law, but in Danish copyright law translation is a specific term that I don't think applies in this case. A translation is a derrivative, but a translation is about either natural language (translating a book from English to Danish) or translating from one artform to another (adapting a book for a movie). Changing a file format from MOV to FLV would not qualify. IANAL. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ > Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
