Yeah, if you're a spammer. :o) - Andreas
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:49:05 +0200, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > well I guess because then its dependant on the feed to include the entire > post body. Not all feeds do that and in some cases you wouldnt want them > to. Wouldnt there be a few good use cases where you might want a > headline > feed (without full post body) but still have the tagging data with the > item? For this, you'd need a tag element in rss > > On 4/18/06, Andreas Haugstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:50:00 +0200, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> > Not to get too far off topic here but the more I think about a tag >> > extension >> > to rss the more I love the idea. It could even have optional links to >> > various clouds. Something like: >> >> [snip] >> >> > I imagine a script could be written pretty easily for use in >> most/any/all >> > blog systems to parse out rel=tag and add the rss info. >> >> And there lies the issue. Why not cut out the middle man? Have the RSS >> reader read the RelTags directly. Less things to go wrong, fewer lines >> of >> code to write. It's win-win. :o) >> >> -- >> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen >> <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ > >> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. >> >> >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > http://www.DavidMeade.com > feed: http://www.DavidMeade.com/feed -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ > Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
