Ooooh, I just got a visual in my head about Borat and that lime green monstrosity he was wearing. I need a cup of tea to wash it out of my mind.
Naw, baby, keep the thong. I like the kind that has the elephants in front. I've never understood why a guy would wear an elephant head on his undies but I take my amusements where I find them. Ah, I love the new frontier. Gena --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Paul Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Damn, Gena, does that mean I have to loose my thong and do and Mr Verdi? > > Oh well > > Here goes, lol > > you may need a zoom > > Paul > > On 29 Dec 2006, at 02:58, Gena wrote: > > > Seems okay on the surface but celebrities or wannabee celebrities > > don't really need or want our help. I don't need 17 shots of anybody > > else that forgot their knickers. > > > > I'd like the team approach to how does your city handle recycling or > > where do people go for a good time that doesn't involve drinking and > > drugging. > > > > Now if famous means folks in your area and you want to show what they > > do then heck yeah. > > > > There are so many stories to be told it makes me sigh for not being > > able to get to them all. > > > > Gena > > > > http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com > > http://pcclibtech.blogspot.com > > http://voxmedia.org/wiki/Video > > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Zack <frigidarium@> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > It occurs to me that if regular people with video cameras > > > were able to meet up together and collectively interview > > > people, for instance famous people, the result could be > > > interesting, for several reasons: > > > > > > (A) A group could probably ask more interesting questions > > > of interviewees than an individual interviewer could. > > > > > > (B) If it's not staged in some way, regular people always > > > have more off the wall questions than MSM people do. > > > > > > (C) The larger the group of interviewers, perhaps the > > > more willing some important people would be to be > > > interviewed, especially "man of the people" types. > > > > > > However there is also big risk: You know how everyone > > > hates the White House Press Corps, because all they do > > > is pose easy, softball questions to Bush and pals. Everyone senses > > > it's staged. The risk would be that bloggers would do the same, > > > or that the mainstream media would imitate them and stage > > > fake populist interviews. Or the MSM could try to discredit > > > the idea by staging especially unruly or disrespect-filled > > > interviews. > > > > > > Zack > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
