Den 01.02.2007 kl. 06:30 skrev Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > here's the exact wording: > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ > "Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by > the author or licensor. "
No, Jay. The human-readable version is watered down to the point where it doesn't make any sense. The exact wording is in the actual license at <URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode > section 4.b: "If you distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work or any Derivative Works or Collective Works, You must keep intact all copyright notices for the Work and provide, reasonable to the medium or means You are utilizing: (i) the name of the Original Author (or pseudonym, if applicable) if supplied, and/or (ii) if the Original Author and/or Licensor designate another party or parties (e.g. a sponsor institute, publishing entity, journal) for attribution in Licensor's copyright notice, terms of service or by other reasonable means, the name of such party or parties; the title of the Work if supplied; to the extent reasonably practicable, the Uniform Resource Identifier, if any, that Licensor specifies to be associated with the Work, unless such URI does not refer to the copyright notice or licensing information for the Work; and in the case of a Derivative Work, a credit identifying the use of the Work in the Derivative Work (e.g., "French translation of the Work by Original Author," or "Screenplay based on original Work by Original Author"). Such credit may be implemented in any reasonable manner; provided, however, that in the case of a Derivative Work or Collective Work, at a minimum such credit will appear where any other comparable authorship credit appears and in a manner at least as prominent as such other comparable authorship credit." Recap: Author's name, Title of the work, URL (to the extent reasonably practicable) and some extra stuff for derrivative works. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >