And as Raymond says, do not let us forget [to ask] the [hard] questions. This is a difficult one for sure.
It is stooping to use boobs; shooting fish in a barrel. Not much sport in it. That's my biggest problem with it. Why calculate the lowest common denominator when the high denominator is so much more fun? Jan On 3/25/07, Bill Cammack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jan McLaughlin" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Don't f'in' get me started. > > > > Aw crap. Here it comes... > > > > The lesson: women must take better / more directed advantage of > silly men. > > They are totally at our mercy. > > > > What is it we women really want? > > > > Why don't more women create these shows and make $ off 'em? I know > there's a > > reason. Can it be a good reason? > > > > Jan > > I hadn't given any thought to the statistics behind whether it's men > or women that exploit the advantage over silly men of "sex sells", but > I'd have to guess that you're right and that there aren't enough women > "behind the camera" as it were in these situations. Women are being > 'used' to drive interest in shows or websites, but other than being > hired as "on-air talent", they're probably not too involved in the > process. > > I wonder how tough it would be for a group of women to get together > and create a production company or whatever to 'exploit' their own > (meaning women in general, not THE women of the production company. > :D) aesthetic advantages. > > A possible reason why not is that ambitious women wouldn't be inclined > to 'stoop so low' to add to the stereotype of utilizing sex or > sexuality to make a profit. > > Who knows? > > Interesting question. :D > > -- > Bill C. > http://TheLab.ReelSolid.TV > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
