http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=wikinazi


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Delongchamp"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sull,
> 
> It may seem discouraging to have your content deleted but I've had
> conversations with you in the past on the importance of
verifiability.  Yes,
> I nominated 'Crowdfunding' for deletion.  However, other editors
voted and
> agreed that it should not be a wikipedia article. It didn't contain any
> sources, the topic was non notable by Wikipedia standards and the
article
> consisted entirely of original research.  (A violation of
Wikipedia's core
> content policies)
> 
> See the discussion here:
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Crowdfunding
> 
> You also failed to mention that the 'Crowdfunding' article has been
deleted
> on 2 other occasions in which I had no involvement or knowledge of.
> 
> Yes, Mmeiser and I have been in an edit war over the Video blog
article's
> content for many of the same reasons.  For months I have tried to
discuss
> the encyclopedic reasons for removing original research, indiscriminate
> links, and the need to cite content from the article.  As responses, I
> received long, ranting, personal attacks and he refused to address my
> encyclopedic reasoning.
> 
> What hasn't been mentioned yet is how Mmeiser recently sought the
help of a
> Wikipedia Administrator.  The result was not surprising.
> 
> a) The administrator did not reinstate the content.
> 
> b) On the contrary, the administrator cited the important of
verifiability
> and suggested to Mmeiser that he try editing content on a separate
page and
> have me look it over and give him suggestions before he place it
into the
> article. (an extreme I still don't think is necessary as long as he uses
> citations when making contributions)
> 
> I tried to extend an olive branch and asked that we work together
> constructively to reintroduce the content with sources.  (what i had
been
> trying to do all along)  He, once again, wrote a long rant, made
personal
> attacks, and announced he was through contributing to the Video blog
> article.
> 
> To date, Mmeiser has contributed a total of one verifiable piece of
content
> to the article. (which i have never deleted)
> 
> It's sometimes difficult to read a long emotional argument like those of
> Mmeiser without being moved to feel the same emotions.  This is what I
> assume happened when I was called pathetic, a loser, a troll, etc by
group
> members earlier.
> 
> Unfortunately, for Mmeiser and some others in this group, personal
attacks
> don't carry much weight in civilized discussions regarding encyclopedic
> content.
> 
> Since the yahoo group discussion began, we've had three people
contribute
> encyclopedic content to the article: Ruperthowe, Bullemhead and
myself.  For
> the amount of discussion we've had in this group, I'd like to see more
> happening to the article.  Let's keep improving it.
> 
> I'm want to get some third party comments in a week or so after
we've done
> some work on it.
> 
> Patrick
> 
> 
> On 5/1/07, sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   that user was also responsible for the deletion of my article
> > 'Crowdfunding'.
> > and yes, meiser has been battling for months.
> > fucking wikipedia. i dont have the time nor patience for such games.
> >
> > On 4/29/07, Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<michael%40michaelverdi.com>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > This user - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pdelongchamp -
constantly
> > > fucks with the entry (deleting everything useful in it). It's
pathetic.
> > I
> > > can't believe Meiser still has the patience to try work on the
article
> > as
> > > his changes usually get deleted within hours.
> > >
> > > - Verdi
> > >
> > > On 4/29/07, Jan McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<jannie.jan%40gmail.com><
> > jannie.jan%40gmail.com>>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Has rather been decimated.
> > > >
> > > > Wow.
> > > >
> > > > Anybody?
> > > >
> > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlog
> > > >
> > > > Jan
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Faux Press - better than real
> > > > http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
> > > > http://twitter.com/fauxpress
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://michaelverdi.com
> > > http://spinxpress.com
> > > http://freevlog.org
> > > Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to