Go for it. http://videoblogginggroup.pbwiki.com/videoblog - Verdi
On 5/1/07, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The field of net video is so dynamic and changing so quickly, that it > may make more sense to have definition and history on a trusted third > party wiki. And have the wikipedia entry removed or not considered > relavant. > > The steps used to define a microformat may be put to use for this. > One of the important steps is finding common usage on the internet to > create a standard: > > http://microformats.org/wiki/process#Propose_a_Microformat > > paraphrasing the page: > > "...A pattern has emerged from successful microformat development > efforts of several specific kinds of wiki pages being created, in a > particular order (though not always).... > > 1. *-examples. Find examples on today's web of the the type of content > you think needs a microformat. Document them with URLs. Document the > implicit schemas that the content examples imply. This is the action > that helps follow principle 3, design for humans first, machines > second ... adapt to current behaviors and usage patterns. Start by > cloning the examples page and filling it out." > > So real examples of the different videoblog types are listed on a wiki > and common attributes are abstracted from them toward the definition. > > -- Enric > -======- > http://cirne.com > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>, > "Michael Verdi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 5/1/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Im answering my own question after researching wikipedia. > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability > > > I guess the main editors at Wikipedia feel that if the major press > > > doesnt cover a story/event....then its probably not worth doing a > > > wikipedia entry about. > > > am i reading this correctly? > > > > > > seems weird that we have a completely new art form that has > > > developed...and we're having difficulty providing information and the > > > backstory. > > > > > > Jay > > > > This is so maddening. If this is really the way it works I'd rather > > request that all articles about videoblogging be removed. To have to > > wait for traditional media to call us up and misquote us so that the > > > > fucked-up-I-just-had-48-hours-to-research-this-article-so-I-kinda-copied-that-other-article-and-made-some-shit-up > > version is what ends up in wikipedia is perfectly absurd. > > > > I can hardly stand talking about this anymore. > > > > FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK > > > > -Verdi > > > > -- > > http://michaelverdi.com > > http://spinxpress.com > > http://freevlog.org > > Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs > > > > > -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
