--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Speaking of Crowdfunding though....
> 
> I had moved the article here for anyone interested in editing it:
> http://crowdfunding.pbwiki.com/
> 
> and this is a cool project that has recognized Crowdfunding and is
looking
> for people interested in this topic to research, write and edit
material.
> It is a joint project between Wired.com and NewAssignment.net.

Congrats, Sull!

  -- Enric
  
> 
> http://zero.newassignment.net/assignmentzero/crowdfunding
> 
> Who needs wikipedia! ;)
> 
> Sull
> 
> On 5/1/07, Patrick Delongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   Sull,
> >
> > It may seem discouraging to have your content deleted but I've had
> > conversations with you in the past on the importance of verifiability.
> > Yes,
> > I nominated 'Crowdfunding' for deletion. However, other editors
voted and
> > agreed that it should not be a wikipedia article. It didn't
contain any
> > sources, the topic was non notable by Wikipedia standards and the
article
> > consisted entirely of original research. (A violation of
Wikipedia's core
> > content policies)
> >
> > See the discussion here:
> >
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Crowdfunding
> >
> > You also failed to mention that the 'Crowdfunding' article has been
> > deleted
> > on 2 other occasions in which I had no involvement or knowledge of.
> >
> > Yes, Mmeiser and I have been in an edit war over the Video blog
article's
> > content for many of the same reasons. For months I have tried to
discuss
> > the encyclopedic reasons for removing original research,
indiscriminate
> > links, and the need to cite content from the article. As responses, I
> > received long, ranting, personal attacks and he refused to address my
> > encyclopedic reasoning.
> >
> > What hasn't been mentioned yet is how Mmeiser recently sought the
help of
> > a
> > Wikipedia Administrator. The result was not surprising.
> >
> > a) The administrator did not reinstate the content.
> >
> > b) On the contrary, the administrator cited the important of
verifiability
> > and suggested to Mmeiser that he try editing content on a separate
page
> > and
> > have me look it over and give him suggestions before he place it
into the
> > article. (an extreme I still don't think is necessary as long as
he uses
> > citations when making contributions)
> >
> > I tried to extend an olive branch and asked that we work together
> > constructively to reintroduce the content with sources. (what i
had been
> > trying to do all along) He, once again, wrote a long rant, made
personal
> > attacks, and announced he was through contributing to the Video blog
> > article.
> >
> > To date, Mmeiser has contributed a total of one verifiable piece of
> > content
> > to the article. (which i have never deleted)
> >
> > It's sometimes difficult to read a long emotional argument like
those of
> > Mmeiser without being moved to feel the same emotions. This is what I
> > assume happened when I was called pathetic, a loser, a troll, etc
by group
> > members earlier.
> >
> > Unfortunately, for Mmeiser and some others in this group, personal
attacks
> > don't carry much weight in civilized discussions regarding
encyclopedic
> > content.
> >
> > Since the yahoo group discussion began, we've had three people
contribute
> > encyclopedic content to the article: Ruperthowe, Bullemhead and
myself.
> > For
> > the amount of discussion we've had in this group, I'd like to see more
> > happening to the article. Let's keep improving it.
> >
> > I'm want to get some third party comments in a week or so after
we've done
> > some work on it.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On 5/1/07, sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <sulleleven%40gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > that user was also responsible for the deletion of my article
> > > 'Crowdfunding'.
> > > and yes, meiser has been battling for months.
> > > fucking wikipedia. i dont have the time nor patience for such games.
> > >
> > > On 4/29/07, Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<michael%40michaelverdi.com>
> > <michael%40michaelverdi.com>>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This user - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pdelongchamp -
> > constantly
> > > > fucks with the entry (deleting everything useful in it). It's
> > pathetic.
> > > I
> > > > can't believe Meiser still has the patience to try work on the
article
> > > as
> > > > his changes usually get deleted within hours.
> > > >
> > > > - Verdi
> > > >
> > > > On 4/29/07, Jan McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<jannie.jan%40gmail.com>
> > <jannie.jan%40gmail.com><
> > > jannie.jan%40gmail.com>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Has rather been decimated.
> > > > >
> > > > > Wow.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anybody?
> > > > >
> > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlog
> > > > >
> > > > > Jan
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Faux Press - better than real
> > > > > http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
> > > > > http://twitter.com/fauxpress
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > http://michaelverdi.com
> > > > http://spinxpress.com
> > > > http://freevlog.org
> > > > Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to