Okay....if you care about the wikipedia article on Videoblogging, lets take all the conversation to that site. Ive jumped in here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Video_blog#Removed_section:_Dispute_over_terminology
"Pdelongchamp, since you seem to have a vision for this page, maybe you can share with us where you want this go. Or are you just being a referee as people make contributions? It'll help me understand exactly what role you are playing in this process. I am assuming good faith, but it's unclear to me where you're mind is at. What is Videoblogging to you? With all the articles and books listed so far, it's difficult to say that it's not a significant artform. I think it would help if we could all agree on the major areas we want to cover. Let's document the discussion/writing over there so its official. To be honest, I read wikipedia all the time, but have never contributed to an article. So it'll be new to me. Patrick, I'm going to take you at your word that you're working in good faith. let's start building. there are so many mainstream articles, books, and scholarly reports to pull from. Jay -- Here I am.... http://jaydedman.com Check out the latest project: http://pixelodeonfest.com/ Webvideo festival this June!!!!
