More on Pownce and the direction that things are moving that I am digging.
"http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/29/business/yourmoney/ 29stream.html?_r=2&th=&adxnnl=0&oref=slogin&emc=th&adxnnlx=1185711510- NtnwJDmiOdut7OWdjG9j3w&pagewanted=print" "...What struck me most was the site's potential to be powerfully disruptive. Most file-sharing occurs on public sites, which can be monitored by media companies; if the users violate copyrights, the sites or the users themselves can be threatened into compliance or litigated out of existence (as happened with the original Napster). File-sharing on Pownce would be difficult to police. If I were a media executive concerned about protecting my intellectual property, I would pounce on Pownce. It's possibly no coincidence that the name Mr. Rose chose for his new venture suggests the Internet gamer's jargon "pwn," which means to take control of a system by exploiting some vulnerability...." --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If anybody has any Pownce invites, I'd love to have one :) > Or, if you've given invites away, I'd like to hear about it. > Interested to see how it'd fit with my consumption and sharing of vlogs. > Twitter has totally changed how I consume media - it has taken over > from RSS because I love the immediacy of it. > > Rupert > http://twittervlog.blogspot.com/ > http://www.twitter.com/ruperthowe/ > http://feeds.feedburner.com/twittervlog/ > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
