Maybe I'm just cranky today, I guess the fact of that particular site as someone's business venture just gives me a reaction not unlike those in the reaction videos. So.... carry on pukin'!
B On 11/16/07, Patrick Delongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > dubious cultural value? > > lol, Brook, it's just a joke. If people want to participate, they'll > do it because it's funny. No cultural value implied. :P > > > On Nov 16, 2007 12:22 PM, Brook Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well... > > > > > > On 11/16/07, Patrick Delongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No vlogs yet? Someone *has* to be up for the challenge. > > > > Maybe the fact that it's been done quite a bit already, as you > > described, limits the appeal. What do further "responses" add to > > anything? And why would we want to use our navlopomo videos to > > publicize some external commercial project of dubious cultural value? > > > > Actually there hasn't been any shortage of ideas with navlopomo'ers at > > all. No one seems to be having any trouble coming up with their own > > ideas from what I've seen. The emphasis on the personal in the group > > might also be a factor in the lack of participation in this > > "challenge". > > > > For me, the problem hasn't been ideas, but time. > > > > Brook > > _______________________________________ > > Brook Hinton > > film/video/audio art > > www.brookhinton.com > > studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab > > > > > -- _______________________________________________________ Brook Hinton film/video/audio art www.brookhinton.com studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab
