That would be interesting.... Like a way to avoid scaling from 640 or something. I'm not familiar with, say Tivo frams sizes enought to know why 720x400 might be beneficial.
That might just be the case... --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "miglsd27" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Maybe it makes a difference if you´re plugging the iPod to a TV? > > Miguel. > > > ok... So checking out the http://GeekBrief.tv formats, I became aware > > yesterday that iPods will play 720x400 video. I just checked this out > > on my iPod Nano, and it works perfectly. > > > > The question is if anyone sees a value for this? Personally, my > > column on my website accommodates video 640 pixels wide. The iPods > > are 640 wide or less. If you choose "iPhone" for encoding video in > > quicktime, it makes a 480 pixel wide file. > > > > It seems to me that unless your site accommodates 720 pixel wide > > video, you're better off using the same data rate for fewer pixels, > > meaning hopefully more quality... Especially if you're aiming @ iTunes > > and iPods. > > > > Opinions? > > > > -- > > Bill Cammack > > BillCammack.com > > ReelSolid.TV > > >
