I dunno. Like I said I do passionately believe in freedom of speech. It acts as a vent for those that feel like they can't be heard any other way. Even the A-holes, trolls and certain orally fixated people have a means of expression. You might be right about YTs not knowing about comment moderation. I know I use it, I have to.
I do think when the young man tried to contact the police there had to be some immediate way for them to contact Google to see the contents of the videos. There should have been an emergency mechanism in place that allowed somebody to see the video and say "this is trouble". I type that but it doesn't make me feel comfortable to have that decision in subjective hands. My anger is bottled up between the cultural permission of men to attack women, and people justifying the attacker and not respecting the victim. Even now nastyness is found on Aisha's post if they haven't taken it down yet. My anger is that this is not the first incident of a man attacking a woman who vlogs and certainly not only on YT. I had a fundamentalist whack job on my tail for months telling me how disgusting I was. Women have stopped vlogging/blogging because of online dog piles that they just couldn't stand any more. I don't blame them a bit. Damn it I want the world to be a better place than what it is. It is happening but not fast enough for me. Rascal, you are more like an agent provocateur. Thanks for hearing me. Gena --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert <rup...@...> wrote: > > That's so awful and sad. > > I know this is only tangential to it, but I think YouTube's hands-off > attitude towards violent, threatening, prejudiced behaviour is > appalling. > > It's a breeding ground for hatred, where people can get themselves > more and more worked up, more and more entrenched in their hatred. > With the tacit blessing of Google. > > Yes, people can shout back, but we've all been online long enough to > know that freedom of reply does nothing to combat trolls and haters. > It just makes them worse, gives them attention. > > The only answer is to shut them down. > > I don't know why more people don't turn on comment approval on > YouTube, or just turn commenting off altogether. The only reason I > can think of is that they don't know they can. > > And I just don't understand why the most popular video sharing site, > potentially a place with great positive impact and opportunity, should > allow itself to be turned into a big pile of shit. > > Is it any wonder Google can't make any money from YouTube > advertising? Who wants to advertise their product next to all that? > > Google should get with the program and crack down. > > They could start by removing people's anonymity. Google should insist > on identifying people by email accounts linked to Google accounts. > And/or have comments set to moderation/approval by default. > > I don't believe this is a freedom of speech issue. > > To say that Freedom of speech equals being able to say whatever you > want on YouTube is nonsense. > > Stopping abusive and offensive comments isn't against freedom of > speech. Shutting down abusive commenters on your site isn't > repressing freedom of speech any more than forcibly ejecting someone > who comes into your garden and starts shouting at you and threatening > you. > > If someone wants to stand in their own garden and shout and threaten, > fair enough. That's freedom of speech. Within the bounds of laws on > incitement to violence. > > One reason to do it is because a huge part of YouTube's audience are > kids. Another reason is that it helped a psychotic continually abuse > one of their users and get so wound up by doing it that he finds her > and kills her. He may have ended up doing it to someone else offline > - that's another issue. But there should be a team of people at > YouTube saying "In our house, this is not acceptable behaviour." > instead of tacitly giving it Google's blessing and a podium. > > Yours fascistically, > > Comment Nazi > http://twittervlog.tv > > On 14-Apr-09, at 3:51 PM, Gena wrote: > > > > > > > This needs to be known and I will not hold my breath for M$M to pay > > attention. She is not white nor blond. I found out via other > > bloggers that this has happened. This is the link for info: > > > > Post from What About Our Daughters blog http://is.gd/smml > > > > The stalker used YT and Facebook to harass and stalk this young > > lady. Another YT person did alert the police but, yeah...well. > > > > I find myself split. I do believe women needs to participate in web > > video and carry their voices forward. All women. But yes, I am > > biased. Especially African-American women. Can't help it and don't > > want too. > > > > But there are old vicious rules about protecting yourself and one of > > those rules is being silent and invisible. It does not matter. You > > still wind up dead and no one outside of your family will known. > > > > For the record, I will not be silent. I will not be invisible. I > > don't post on YT because of the type of nasty vile comments, > > behaviors and TOS. But I do support freedom of speech. > > > > Do what this information what you will. I am angry and I am sad. > > > > Gena > > http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
