The law allows you to use a legal copy of a film IN class  under the FACE to
Face teaching instruction. You may not digitize and stream a film without
permission/license from the rights holder. "Educational Goals" is sort of
wishful thinking statement. If you could do anything you wanted because
someone wanted to see a film, you could buy bootlegs, digitize all your VHS,
heck just borrow some item from NetFlix  or a local video store and copy it.
You can by a film for $19.95 or $295.00 but it comes with specific rights
and unless streaming is specifically included ( usually at a additional
cost) you don't have them.

Streaming rights are very complicated because other than studio films ( and
by no means all of those) most films can not currently be sold with
perpetual rights. Film rights tend to be on 7 to 10 year contracts with the
distributors. I imagine some new contracts may indeed allow the sale of
perpetual streaming rights but the number would not be high. Frankly I would
be cautious on buying any perpetual rights on other than very new releases
of non fiction films. I would have the seller certify they have those rights
to sell in the terms of their contract as distributors very rarely own a
film in perpetuity themselves.


On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Ball, James (jmb4aw) <
jmb...@eservices.virginia.edu> wrote:

>  Hello Everyone,
>
>
>
> I’m a bit perplexed by the complex licensing and pricing structures of
> streaming rights, and some of the recent talk on this listserv has helped
> clarify a question that’s been floating around my mind for a while, so I
> figure I’ll pose it to the collective wisdom.
>
>
>
> If I can buy a DVD for, say, $295.00 and I can keep it forever, and  I’m
> allowed to do certain things with it to meet the educational goals of my
> institution, then why is it different for a streaming version of the same
> title?  Some streaming rights have to be renewed every few years. Or, if
> there are perpetual rights they are often priced exorbitantly high.  Doesn’t
> it make sense to pay the same price as for a DVD (maybe even less since
> manufacturing costs wouldn’t be an issue) and keep it forever, just like a
> DVD?  Or even an e-book.  And, as with  an e-book, I would be bound to
> restrict access to it only to members of my institution.
>
>
>
> Perhaps this is a gross oversimplification of something that’s actually
> quite complex, so consider these the innocent (demented?) musings of a
> newbie, but I’d be interested in hearing others’ thoughts on the matter.
>
>
>
> Yours in hopefully not opening a Pandora’s box,
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
>
>
>
> Matt Ball
> Media and Collections Librarian
> University of Virginia
> Charlottesville, VA  22904
> mattb...@virginia.edu<https://mail.eservices.virginia.edu/owa/redir.aspx?C=62fe60f092584617be4c37bdfc2dcf42&URL=mailto%3amattball%40virginia.edu>|
>  434-924-3812
>
>
>
> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues
> relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control,
> preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and
> related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective
> working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication
> between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and
> distributors.
>
>
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

Reply via email to