The Constitution has a broad concept of copyright law but there have
been over 200 years of changes and case law that has developed. Pretty
much any filmmaker I know thinks of themselves as the owner of a film
and since I can't imagine any of them living 95 years past their
creations as a practical matter they are correct. As it happens the
basic definitions of "fair use " did not become codified in US law
till 1976 though case law existed prior to that. If you do not want to
see yourself as the owner of a film you make that is your right but
the majority of filmmakers feel otherwise and while money is a major
issue, the ability to control one's work is certainly a bigger issue
with filmmakers I work with.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Troy Davis <mtd...@wm.edu> wrote:
> the constitution suggests we must be flexible in protecting the public
> good. it doesn't say someone can go gangster and pirate my film. that
> might happen. ok. the constitutional premise opens up ethical and
> moral opportunities where someone might have to stream or copy my film
> "for the public good." that is their decision and dilemma. i think
> there was a good string about that on this message. and I think the
> ARL document opens up a conversation about this, and jessica, you are
> a part of it for sure; i really appreciate your enthusiasm.
>
> i can't afford to give my film away, but i most certainly can't afford
> to use some metaphor of "property" to limit how others might want to
> use it "for the public good." and, again, i don't own the film, or
> the "work," I only own the "rights" to it. (and those are a
> constellation of publishing rights outlined in the statute).
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Jessica Rosner
> <jessicapros...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> You had me up until the part about streaming it for the public good.
>> The Constitution does not intervene in the slightest. There is nothing
>> in the Constitution that says someone can stream ( or copy) your film
>> for the "public good", nothing even close in copyright law. If you
>> believe this I hope you have can afford to make a film to give away,
>> but most filmmakers can not. Like it or not the current time frame you
>> will own your film is 95 years but people can under various
>> circumstances ( most definitely including parody) use portions of your
>> film to create new works.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Troy Davis <mtd...@wm.edu> wrote:
>>> i believe i own the film i'm working on right now, "the work," a
>>> documentary about emerging a/v culture in cuba, but whether i like it
>>> or not, i only own the "rights" to it, for a limited time. and others
>>> can use it, tweak it, parody it, stream it, if they decide it is for
>>> the public good (not the public domain). and i have to eat too! and so
>>> do all the people involved in it. too bad the constitution intervenes!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Jessica Rosner
>>> <jessicapros...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I can think of many filmmakers I work with who actually believe they
>>>> own their works. Most of them are delighted when people in the
>>>> academic community want to use
>>>> their work, but they do believe they should get paid for the proper
>>>> use of it because believe it or not they have to eat.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Troy Davis <mtd...@wm.edu> wrote:
>>>>> jessica, not sure if you responded to me, but if so, i think we are
>>>>> all talking about works "protected" by copyright law, right? the
>>>>> public domain is where things "should" end up after a short time, only
>>>>> because those dudes who wrote the constitution thought so. my point
>>>>> was/is that copyright is not about metaphors of "property" but rather
>>>>> about metaphors of "use." (for the public good). we might not like
>>>>> that means/ends argument, but it is there, no matter how many
>>>>> particular cases we bring up and examine.
>>>>>
>>>>> troy
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Jessica Rosner
>>>>> <jessicapros...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Fair enough but we are not talking about public domain material but
>>>>>> how to use material still fully protected by copyright laws.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Troy Davis <mtd...@wm.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>> this is completely fascinating discussion, and i'm glad we are having
>>>>>>> it. while we can "tweak" the regime of particular uses of works (after
>>>>>>> all, we must), i'm gonna go high road, and I think this is the spirit
>>>>>>> of the ARL guidelines: Copyright is rooted in the Constitutional aim
>>>>>>> to promote learning, protect the public domain, and insure the right
>>>>>>> of the broadest public access to information.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some reflection on the Constitutional premise of copyright leads one
>>>>>>> (or at least, me) to see that the means of copyright (the securing of
>>>>>>> exclusive rights to authors for a limited time) are designed to
>>>>>>> support the ends of copyright (the promotion of learning). The
>>>>>>> copyright clause does not grant ownership of works, rather it simply
>>>>>>> grants ownership of rights, “exclusive rights” for a limited time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Troy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Chris Lewis <cle...@american.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I also think it makes a difference vis a vis fair use if a video is
>>>>>>>> streaming and copy-protected and can only be viewed during a short
>>>>>>>> period whereas a book could be easily copied and kept indefinitely.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:31 PM, jwoo <j...@cca.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> No, that logic doesn't follow: literature classes read Catcher in the
>>>>>>>>> Rye etc. as the literary work it was intended to be when published.
>>>>>>>>> However, if one were doing linguistic analysis of Catcher in the Rye,
>>>>>>>>> then it would be fair use to digitize and use that text for
>>>>>>>>> computational purposes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Feb 6, 2012, at 5:36 PM, Jessica Rosner wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Wow just Wow that is one the craziest things I have heard but not
>>>>>>>>>> surprised. So I assume by the same "logic' most written works from
>>>>>>>>>> Catcher in the Rye to Conspiracy of Dunces can be scanned and posted
>>>>>>>>>> on line for classes since after all they were written for
>>>>>>>>>> entertainment.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And you people wonder why I don't trust the "lawyers" working on
>>>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:07 PM, jwoo <j...@cca.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Feature films seem to be a particularly controversial area, because
>>>>>>>>>>> if I understood Peter Jaszi correctly when he responded to
>>>>>>>>>>> questions about the Best Practices today: to use a film that was
>>>>>>>>>>> originally marketed for entertaininment purposes for educational
>>>>>>>>>>> purposes would be a transformative use. Page 8-9 talk about legal
>>>>>>>>>>> precedents for this, but it's not very detailed.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To me this seems to fly in the face of Fair Use factor 4 because
>>>>>>>>>>> feature films tend to be readily accessible for loan, rent, or
>>>>>>>>>>> purchase at reasonable prices. But I can see how it would apply to
>>>>>>>>>>> videos priced at institutional tiered rates because what student or
>>>>>>>>>>> instructor is going to shell out $250 to watch a film as part of a
>>>>>>>>>>> class assignment? If streamed, it's not going to affect sales
>>>>>>>>>>> anyway. But if a video were only marketed as educational, then
>>>>>>>>>>> Peter Jaszi's transformative use wouldn't come into play, though a
>>>>>>>>>>> high price could make it fair under factor 4.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This doesn't apply to most books because students have been
>>>>>>>>>>> enculturated to pay for expensive text books, which is why it
>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't be fair to scan an entire book and post it online under
>>>>>>>>>>> factor 4.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> that's my two cents anyway
>>>>>>>>>>> Janice Woo
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 6, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Jessica Rosner wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am afraid the focus on feature films is my fault Bob. I will be
>>>>>>>>>>>> honest, I focus on features because to me it makes it even clearer
>>>>>>>>>>>> that the people pushing the "best practices" and other similar
>>>>>>>>>>>> views
>>>>>>>>>>>> on "fair use" (and that there is no limit to amount you can use)
>>>>>>>>>>>> often
>>>>>>>>>>>> want to justify streaming of entire films without any regard to
>>>>>>>>>>>> rights and use. The term "educational " film really does not have
>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>> legal meaning however in the case of the TEACH ACT ( which I
>>>>>>>>>>>> believe
>>>>>>>>>>>> is the only area where this applies) films made exclusively for
>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction are an exempt class but then so are all fiction films.
>>>>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of the financial damage one could argue that the streaming a
>>>>>>>>>>>> more costly "educational" film might be more damaging than a
>>>>>>>>>>>> standard
>>>>>>>>>>>> feature film, but I rather doubt it. The core issue remains the
>>>>>>>>>>>> claim
>>>>>>>>>>>> that in essence "fair use" is whatever the institution decides it
>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> and that any use they accept is "tranformative" .
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Bob Norris <b...@filmideas.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This may seem like a naive question, but is all the focus on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> theatrical
>>>>>>>>>>>>> because it is assumed that a program from an educational
>>>>>>>>>>>>> distributor would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not qualify under fair use because of the adverse affect upon the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> potential
>>>>>>>>>>>>> market for or value of the copyrighted work? And if this is true,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> extend to segments of a program if the distributors sells digital
>>>>>>>>>>>>> segments
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the program?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think Film Ideas would be willing to agree its license
>>>>>>>>>>>>> agreements shall
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not supersede the rights already granted to users under copyright
>>>>>>>>>>>>> law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Although, if we cannot agree on what the law states, I'm not sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>> how much
>>>>>>>>>>>>> weight that statement carries.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Norris
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Managing Director
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Film Ideas, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Phone: (847) 419-0255
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Email: b...@filmideas.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:16 PM, videolib-requ...@lists.berkeley.edu
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Simpkins, Terry W." <tsimp...@middlebury.edu>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: February 6, 2012 12:41:16 PM CST
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: "videolib@lists.berkeley.edu" <videolib@lists.berkeley.edu>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Videolib] ACRL Best Practices
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reply-To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jessica Rosner asks "If you ... are sincere that you are not the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> enemy of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> content owners, how bout a simple and CLEAR statement that "fair
>>>>>>>>>>>>> use' does
>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT cover the use of feature material being assigned to classes."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am not one of the authors of the guidelines, but I can imagine
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that one
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason they might be uncomfortable with such a statement is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> because, well,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it has no basis in the law. We all know the drill by heart,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't we? Each
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fair use decision includes a judgment about the nature of the use
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (perhaps
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "assigned to class," in a non-profit setting), the nature of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (perhaps "feature material"), the amount being used (perhaps the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> whole film,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> perhaps not), and the effect on the market (perhaps a large
>>>>>>>>>>>>> negative effect,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> perhaps it will stimulate interest and sales). The law
>>>>>>>>>>>>> deliberately
>>>>>>>>>>>>> requires us to reflect on each of these aspects. It is not a mere
>>>>>>>>>>>>> check-list that makes simplistic assertions about whether using
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>> highly-generalized type of material ("feature films") in another
>>>>>>>>>>>>> highly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> generalized setting ("classes") is, or is not, fair use. Why on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> earth would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> librarians and educators (or any sane individual, for that matter)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> voluntarily limit rights granted to us by law? If the law was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> intended to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> exempt "feature materials" from the fair use provisions in this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> manner, I am
>>>>>>>>>>>>> confident it would have been written to say that. Perhaps content
>>>>>>>>>>>>> owners
>>>>>>>>>>>>> might make a similarly "simple and clear statement" saying that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> license
>>>>>>>>>>>>> agreements shall not under any circumstances supersede the rights
>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>> granted to users under the fair use, or any other, provision of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> copyright law, just to "prove" they are not the "enemy" of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> education.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The law as written does not protect those librarians, students,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> faculty, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> administrators who seek to use fair use as a shield to avoid
>>>>>>>>>>>>> buying
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sufficient licensed or legally acquired copies. I'm sure there
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are folks
>>>>>>>>>>>>> out there, possibly even on this list, who do that. There are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> unethical
>>>>>>>>>>>>> practitioners in every field - yes, including librarians,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> educators, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> even media distributors - but the law already prohibits, for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> example,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> showing a film in a public setting without permission just
>>>>>>>>>>>>> because someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wants to save on licensing fees.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and my understanding about books is that, when it comes to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fair use, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> same factors apply. As far as I know, there is no blanket legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prohibition
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on libraries scanning an entire book and posting it online.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Using the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> entire work, whether in the case of a film or a book, certainly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriately makes satisfying the fair use test that much more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> difficult.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it does not automatically render it impossible, however much
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ms. Rosner
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or anyone else would like it to be so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Terry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Terry Simpkins
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Director, Research and Collection Services
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Library & Information Services
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (802) 443-5045
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>> relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
>>>>>>>>>>>>> control,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> libraries and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> effective
>>>>>>>>>>>>> working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication
>>>>>>>>>>>>> between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> distributors.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jessica Rosner
>>>>>>>>>>>> Media Consultant
>>>>>>>>>>>> 224-545-3897 (cell)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 212-627-1785 (land line)
>>>>>>>>>>>> jessicapros...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion
>>>>>>>>>>>> of issues relating to the selection, evaluation,
>>>>>>>>>>>> acquisition,bibliographic control, preservation, and use of
>>>>>>>>>>>> current and evolving video formats in libraries and related
>>>>>>>>>>>> institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective
>>>>>>>>>>>> working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
>>>>>>>>>>>> communication between libraries,educational institutions, and
>>>>>>>>>>>> video producers and distributors.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion
>>>>>>>>>>> of issues relating to the selection, evaluation,
>>>>>>>>>>> acquisition,bibliographic control, preservation, and use of current
>>>>>>>>>>> and evolving video formats in libraries and related institutions.
>>>>>>>>>>> It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool
>>>>>>>>>>> for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication between
>>>>>>>>>>> libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and
>>>>>>>>>>> distributors.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Jessica Rosner
>>>>>>>>>> Media Consultant
>>>>>>>>>> 224-545-3897 (cell)
>>>>>>>>>> 212-627-1785 (land line)
>>>>>>>>>> jessicapros...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
>>>>>>>>>> issues relating to the selection, evaluation,
>>>>>>>>>> acquisition,bibliographic control, preservation, and use of current
>>>>>>>>>> and evolving video formats in libraries and related institutions. It
>>>>>>>>>> is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for
>>>>>>>>>> video librarians, as well as a channel of communication between
>>>>>>>>>> libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and
>>>>>>>>>> distributors.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
>>>>>>>>> issues relating to the selection, evaluation,
>>>>>>>>> acquisition,bibliographic control, preservation, and use of current
>>>>>>>>> and evolving video formats in libraries and related institutions. It
>>>>>>>>> is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for
>>>>>>>>> video librarians, as well as a channel of communication between
>>>>>>>>> libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and
>>>>>>>>> distributors.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Chris Lewis
>>>>>>>> Media Librarian
>>>>>>>> American University Library
>>>>>>>> 202.885.3257
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For latest Media Services News:
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://aulibmedia.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>> Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/76uk7vr
>>>>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/aulibmedia
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please think twice before printing this e-mail.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
>>>>>>>> issues relating to the selection, evaluation,
>>>>>>>> acquisition,bibliographic control, preservation, and use of current
>>>>>>>> and evolving video formats in libraries and related institutions. It
>>>>>>>> is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for
>>>>>>>> video librarians, as well as a channel of communication between
>>>>>>>> libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and
>>>>>>>> distributors.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> M. Troy Davis | (757) 279-8871
>>>>>>> Director, Swem Media Center
>>>>>>> Earl Gregg Swem Library
>>>>>>> The College of William & Mary
>>>>>>> mtd...@wm.edu
>>>>>>> ---------
>>>>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/swemmedia/
>>>>>>> http://www.facebook.com/swemmedia
>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/swemmedia
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
>>>>>>> issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
>>>>>>> control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
>>>>>>> libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will
>>>>>>> serve as an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a
>>>>>>> channel of communication between libraries,educational institutions,
>>>>>>> and video producers and distributors.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jessica Rosner
>>>>>> Media Consultant
>>>>>> 224-545-3897 (cell)
>>>>>> 212-627-1785 (land line)
>>>>>> jessicapros...@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
>>>>>> issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
>>>>>> control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
>>>>>> libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve
>>>>>> as an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel
>>>>>> of communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
>>>>>> producers and distributors.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> M. Troy Davis | (757) 279-8871
>>>>> Director, Swem Media Center
>>>>> Earl Gregg Swem Library
>>>>> The College of William & Mary
>>>>> mtd...@wm.edu
>>>>> ---------
>>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/swemmedia/
>>>>> http://www.facebook.com/swemmedia
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/swemmedia
>>>>>
>>>>> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
>>>>> issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
>>>>> control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
>>>>> libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve
>>>>> as an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel
>>>>> of communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
>>>>> producers and distributors.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jessica Rosner
>>>> Media Consultant
>>>> 224-545-3897 (cell)
>>>> 212-627-1785 (land line)
>>>> jessicapros...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
>>>> issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
>>>> control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
>>>> libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve
>>>> as an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
>>>> communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
>>>> producers and distributors.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> M. Troy Davis | (757) 279-8871
>>> Director, Swem Media Center
>>> Earl Gregg Swem Library
>>> The College of William & Mary
>>> mtd...@wm.edu
>>> ---------
>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/swemmedia/
>>> http://www.facebook.com/swemmedia
>>> http://www.youtube.com/swemmedia
>>>
>>> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues
>>> relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control,
>>> preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries
>>> and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an
>>> effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
>>> communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
>>> producers and distributors.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jessica Rosner
>> Media Consultant
>> 224-545-3897 (cell)
>> 212-627-1785 (land line)
>> jessicapros...@gmail.com
>>
>> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues
>> relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control,
>> preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and
>> related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective
>> working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication
>> between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and
>> distributors.
>
>
>
> --
> M. Troy Davis | (757) 279-8871
> Director, Swem Media Center
> Earl Gregg Swem Library
> The College of William & Mary
> mtd...@wm.edu
> ---------
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/swemmedia/
> http://www.facebook.com/swemmedia
> http://www.youtube.com/swemmedia
>
> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues
> relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control,
> preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and
> related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective
> working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication
> between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and
> distributors.
--
Jessica Rosner
Media Consultant
224-545-3897 (cell)
212-627-1785 (land line)
jessicapros...@gmail.com
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control,
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and
distributors.
