For your collective knowledge Docs for Education is proposing the following terms for 3 year license for streaming, 3 years because who knows what will be the law in 3 years no need to buy longer term today, you can notice that if you already have PPR license then we are asking only $100 for the streaming I believe that is fair. Any body asking more is trying to make unfair money $175 for library & classroom use.
$250 for public screenings when no admission fee is charged. $500 for screenings with paying audiences. Shipping and handling fee is $6. $350 DVD and streaming rights with 3 year license from institution's own internal server. $100 Streaming rights for institutions with 3 year license from institution's own internal server that already purchased the DVD with Public Screening rights. $175 Streaming rights for institutions with 3 year license from institution's own internal server that already purchased the DVD with only Library use. These prices are for all titles at http://docsforeducation.com/ except "One Day After Peace" see http://onedayafterpeace.com/index.php which is sold only as PPR for $300 Lets have a peaceful 2013 Nahum Laufer http://onedayafterpeace.com/index.php http://docsforeducation.com/ Sales Docs for Education Erez Laufer Films Holland st 10 Afulla 18371 Israel -----Original Message----- From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of videolib-requ...@lists.berkeley.edu Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 8:35 PM To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu Subject: videolib Digest, Vol 62, Issue 25 Send videolib mailing list submissions to videolib@lists.berkeley.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://calmail.berkeley.edu/manage/list/listinfo/video...@lists.berkeley.ed u or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to videolib-requ...@lists.berkeley.edu You can reach the person managing the list at videolib-ow...@lists.berkeley.edu When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of videolib digest..." Today's Topics: 1. RAW FAITH Video Librarian Best Doc Announcement! (Serena Koch) 2. Re: Streaming licensing for DVD?s already owned (Jessica Rosner) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- Message: 2 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:34:53 -0500 From: Jessica Rosner <maddux2...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Videolib] Streaming licensing for DVD?s already owned To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu Message-ID: <CACRe6m8b=nxryoo12nphd69qa2ftre6s_2cm-knbbpi6gmp...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Well from the point of view of the rights holder it is not about enhanced services but about enhanced rights. It is obviously different to own a physical copy that can be used in the classroom which is basically covered by the "face to face" exemption and circulated by the library to streaming it online for students to watch from anywhere over a long period. There have been two major legal cases on it but the results are not that helpful. In the UCLA Case where UCLA streamed thousands of titles and one the US distributors sued them, the case was tossed on issues that had nothing to do the right to stream ( mostly the standing of plaintiff who owned the US rights but was not the overall rights holder who was not a party). The Georgia State case is a little closer but involved the streaming of articles or book chapters rather than films. When the case was first brought by a group of small presses GSU was streaming entire works but changed it's policy immediately after the suite was filed. In the end while the judge ruled mostly in favor of Georgia State, she had also said that no more than 10% of a written work could ever be covered as "fair use" in online streaming. The case had a lot of other issues including the issue of if universities could stream a work if the rights holder did not have a streaming option. The publishers are appealing many of the issues and as it directly contradicts previous rulings like Kinkos and Michigan books it is likely to be taken up by the Appeals court. For the record the California Newsreel rates are actually pretty low since they offering what appears to be a lifetime license. Keep in mind that many distributors literally don't even own the rights to license many of their titles as it was generally not included in older contracts so it is tricky for them. On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Rasmussen, Anne <rasmu...@uwp.edu> wrote: > Dear Collective Wisdom,**** > > ** ** > > I am brand-new in my role as Copyright Librarian in our library. I am > seeking clarification and any recent developments regarding ?streaming > licenses? for DVDs already owned by an institution. **** > > ** ** > > As our institution begins to offer more distance education courses, I > am beginning to receive requests to stream DVDs (already in our > library > collection) for students to access through our Course Management > System (D2L). In my research, I have come across publishers? websites > who inform readers that a ?streaming license? for DVDs purchased > previously (even at the institutional rate) is required to provide > access to our distance education students. The instance I am working > on now involves a title published by California Newsreel: > http://www.newsreel.org/streaming-license.asp **** > > ** ** > > At this point, I am wondering if I am missing something? These > licensing fees nearly double the amount of the one-time purchase and > do not provide any enhanced services (as we are required to encode > digital streaming and store files at our institution). Can anyone > clarify my understanding? I read Carrie Russell?s 2010 article from > Library Trends regarding the state of this debate: > http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/library_trends/v058/58.3.russell.html > **** > > ** ** > > Have there been any legal developments regarding this since Carrie?s > publication in 2010? What policies have your libraries adopted > regarding ?streaming licensing? (of dvds already purchased and in your > collection) for classroom/educational use?**** > > ** ** > > Anne**** > > ** ** > > Anne F. Rasmussen**** > > Continuing Resources and Copyright Librarian**** > > University of Wisconsin - Parkside**** > > 900 Wood Road**** > > Kenosha, WI 53141**** > > (262) 595-2420**** > > anne.rasmus...@uwp.edu**** > > ** ** > > [image: logo] <http://www.uwp.edu/>**** > > ** ** > > The information contained in this email message is intended only for > the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. > This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work > product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of > this message is not the intended recipient, or an agent responsible > for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > that you have received this document in error. You are notified that > any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify me immediately by email, and delete the original > message.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of > issues relating to the selection, evaluation, > acquisition,bibliographic control, preservation, and use of current > and evolving video formats in libraries and related institutions. It > is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for > video librarians, as well as a channel of communication between > libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment scrubbed and removed. HTML attachments are only available in MIME digests. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed and removed. Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 4586 bytes Desc: not available Non-text attachments are only available in MIME digests. End of videolib Digest, Vol 62, Issue 25 **************************************** VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.
