I favot making them public in case a distributor or other rights holder comes along to request a takedown. It shows that the library might have digitized it when the item was unavailable and hence remains a legitimate preservation copy.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Laura Jenemann <ljene...@gmu.edu> wrote: > Hello, > > > > Some of the libraries who are documenting their Sec. 108 copies include > dates of transfer in their public records. > > > > For example: 500 note: This was transferred from Xxx on September 8, 2012. > > > > Are there reasons for or against making these public catalog notes? > Suppressing for internal use? > > > > Thank you for any responses you can share! > > > > Regards, > > Laura > > > > Laura Jenemann > > Media Services, Film Studies, Dance Librarian > > George Mason University > > 703-993-7593 > > ljene...@gmu.edu > > > > VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of > issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic > control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in > libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as > an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of > communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video > producers and distributors. > > -- Chris Lewis American University Library 202.885.3257
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.
