A very enthusiastic "second" to Terry's response. If we want to get into ethics as far as this matter is concerned, aren't those of us tasked with funding responsibilities charged with making the best use of our limited funds? To my mind, routinely spending money on rights you do not (by law) need raises ethical concerns. I might also be concerned about the copyright specialist's facility with exemptions that fall outside the scope of Fair Use (such as the Face-to-Face teaching exemption, the TEACH Act, DMCA, etc.) Just as there are many distributors who are ill-informed about PPR and the need for special 'educational' rights in the U.S., there are plenty of folks in academia who use the 'Fair Use' brush inelegantly (perhaps inappropriately).

Good luck,

--
Meghann Matwichuk, M.S.
Associate Librarian
Film and Video Collection
Morris Library, University of Delaware
181 S. College Ave.
Newark, DE 19717
(302) 831-1475
http://www.lib.udel.edu/filmandvideo


On 6/15/2015 12:45 PM, Simpkins, Terry W. wrote:

Hi Anna

This issue crops up in various forms fairly frequently. First, however, a minor point of clarification. Classroom screenings are actually NOT “fair use” (17 U.S. Code § 107) <https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107> but rather fall under a different section of the USCode relating limitations to exclusive rights, namely 17 U.S. Code § 110 <https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/110>. This is actually a good thing, in my opinion, since you do not have to apply the (notoriously, albeit sometimes usefully, vague) “four factor” fair use test when it comes to face-to-face classroom screenings. Section 110 does, however, outline a variety of other conditions that need to be met, but these conditions are pretty straightforward to interpret.

As for the ethicality of doing this: why on earth would it be /unethical/ to assert rights granted to you under the law? If you want to talk about what is or is not ethical, how about distributors who, whether through ignorance of the law or outright deceit, attempt to coerce or scare you into wasting your institutional resources by buying overpriced copies that come with PPR you may not need?

At Middlebury, if we need PPR, we purchase PPR. If we don’t need PPR, we buy the lowest price copy we can legally acquire. Don’t overthink, and stand up for rights that are yours.

Regards,

Terry

*Terry Simpkins*

Director, Discovery & Access Services

Library & Information Services

Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753

(802) 443-5045

twsimp...@middlebury.edu <mailto:twsimp...@middlebury.edu>__

*From:*videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] *On Behalf Of *Anna Simon
*Sent:* Monday, June 15, 2015 12:15 PM
*To:* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
*Subject:* [Videolib] Library policy on buying institutional video copies

Our library is currently re-writing its policy on buying institutional video. Under the guidance of our copyright specialist who says that classroom screenings fall under fair-use and do not require PPR (which are included in most institutional prices), our new policy is to buy the home-use copy of the DVD, if available, and not the institutional copy. Of course if a video will be screened outside a class, say at a film festival, we will upgrade to a PPR.

At least one distributor has balked at this policy; another actually suggested we purchase at the home-use price when I mentioned I couldn't afford to buy all the videos I wanted from his company at the institutional price.

Legally this seems sound, but I'm still unsure about ethically. Do other libraries have a policy on this spelled out? Do you always buy the institutional price/PPR if available, or do you try to source the video at the lowest possible price? If you do buy the institutional copy is it because you feel you *should* or another reason?

Thanks for sharing.

Library-logo-ES.png

        

*Anna Simon *
Collection, Research & Instruction Librarian
Art, Film, and Museum Studies
202-687-7467
ajs...@georgetown.edu <mailto:ajs...@georgetown.edu>
Ars Hoya: GU Art Blog <https://blogs.commons.georgetown.edu/ajs299/>


Georgetown University
Lauinger Library
37th & O Sts. NW
Washington, DC 20057



VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

Reply via email to