On Wednesday 04 August 2004 21:27, Larry Nguyen wrote:
> > Yoper V2(pre2) -Install time 12min. /Sysmem-93/Usermem-184 /Timing
> > buffer cache reads -1528mb:sec/Timing buffer disk reads-18.47mb:sec
> > /Loading time-Moz-6.3sec/Loading time-Konq.-1.1sec.
>
> <snip>
>
> Cha'u co' xem qua Yoper site nhu+ng kho^ng tha^'y ca'i ba`i na`o co' info
> na`y. Kho^ng bie^'t khi ho. so sa'nh, so^' lu+o+.ng ca'c go'i ca`i dda(.t
> co' gio^'ng nhau kho^ng? Cha'u nghi~ la` kho^ng vi` Yoper kho^ng ca`i
> dda(.t tu+`ng go'i ma` la` copy nguye^n pre-installed Yoper partition le^n
> ma'y cu?a ba'c.
Mi`nh dda^u bie^'t nhu+~ng chuye^.n ky~ thua^.t na`y! Tre^n ma'y mi`nh sau khi
install, cha.y df no' ba'o 1,7 GB.
nhu+ va^.y qua? co' nhie^`u ho+n bi`nh thu+o+`ng so vo+'i ma^'y ca'i kha'c.
Nhu+ng mie^~n sao no' ca`i vo^ nhanh, cha.y ddu+o+.c, cha.y nhanh, va` la`m
ma^'y vie^.c kia ddu+o+.c la` OK ro^`i. Xa`i theo chi? tie^u niubi ma`. Khi
na`o le^n chu+'c se~ ti'nh tie^'p dda^u co' kho' nu+~a.
> Ca'i na`y thi` cha('c cha('n se~ mau ho+n nhu+~ng distros
> tha^.t su+. ca`i dda(.t tu+`ng go'i.
Chie^u "ru't gan bo? ruo^.t" cu?a ca^.u va` Nguyen Thanh Bien sao kho' hie^?u
qua', mo` hoa`i kho^ng ra? La`m o+n chi? la.i ddi. 1,7 GB ru't xuo^'ng co`n
bao nhie^u?
> DDie^?m thu+' nhi` ho. no'i su+? du.ng Con Kolivas kernel. Ba'c bie^'t chu'
> na`y la` ai 0? :) Hint: ba'c xem la.i ca'i mail cha'u post ve^` vie^.c
> kho^ng du`ng nice trong Xsession ne^'u ba'c va^~n co`n giu+~ message ddo'.
Con Kolivac kernel la` gi`? Thuye^'t pha'p cho ba` con nghe ddi. DDe^? xem
la.i mail cu~.
>
> -Larry-- m k h _ s g nTitle: YOPER: Your Operating System > Speed Comparison - YOPER Linux V2 vs. 22 Distros
Full Version: Speed Comparison - YOPER Linux V2 vs. 22 Distros
After many long nights, here are accurate conclusions of testing, compared to YOPER Linux V2 (Prefinal).
Test Platform: IBM T-40 2373-72u / Pentium M Class x86 / 768 MB DDR memory
Test Environment: Full use of disk, 1 GB of swap
Test Basis: Base install as each developer group has chosen. With Debian and Slackware, bare minimum install with KDE.
Purpose: To determine which Linux distribution is the fastest and most efficient in the world.
Categories:
01. MI - Menu Intelligence = Intuitive / Functional / Unreasonable
02. ID - Install Difficulty = Advanced / Normal / Simple
03. FR - Font Rendering = Excellent / Good / Fair
04. TBCR - Timing Buffer Cache Reads
05. TBDR - Timing Buffer Disk Reads
06. Ms - Total Memory cached
07. Mu - Total User memory
08. IT- Install Time
09. BT - Boot Time
10. GQ - Graphical Quality = Superb / Good / Fair
==================================================
YOPER Linux V2 (Prefinal): MI=I; ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=1279.23; TBDR=19.49; Ms=219; Mu=66; IT=8; BT=0.56; GQ=G
01. Linspire: MI=I: ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=821.31; TBDR=12.74; Ms=258; Mu=102; IT=42; BT=1.48; GQ=S
02. SuSE 9.0: MI=F: ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=784.67; TBDR=14.83; Ms=312; Mu=168; IT=48; BT=2.15; GQ=S
03. SuSE 9.1: MI=F: ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=818; TBDR=14.21; Ms=326; Mu=181; IT=58; BT=1.4; GQ=S
04. DEB_3r2: MI=F: ID=A; FR=F; TBCR=623; TBDR=6.71; Ms=292; Mu=171; IT=25; BT=1.21; GQ=F
05. Fedora Core 2: MI=F; ID=N; FR=F; TBCR=581; TBDR=11.37; Ms=283; Mu=151; IT=57; BT=2.18; GQ=G
06. Xandros: MI=I; ID=s; FR=G; TBCR=823; TBDR=17.46; Ms=327; Mu=182; IT=31; BT=1.46; GQ=S
07. Slackware 10: MI=F; ID=A; FR=G; TBCR=756; TBDR=17.43; Ms=241; Mu=82; IT=46; BT=1.07; GQ=G
08. Aurox 9.4: MI=I; ID=N; FR=G; TBCR=684; TBDR=12.68; Ms=252; Mu=146; IT=33; BT=1.46; GQ=F
09. Connectiva 10: MI=I; ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=715; TBDR=19.01; Ms=346; Mu=181; IT=26; BT=1.10; GQ=S
10. BLAG: MI=I; ID=s; FR=G; TBCR=493; TBDR=19.75; Ms=224; Mu=111; IT=37; BT=1.56; GQ=G
11. Overclockix: MI=F; ID=N; FR=G; TBCR=635; TBDR=6.21; Ms=305; Mu=193; IT=16; BT=2.1; GQ=G
12. Munjoy: MI=F; ID=s; FR=G; TBCR=688.58; TBDR=19.41; Ms=192; Mu=82; IT=28; BT=2.13; GQ=G
13. LBA: MI=I; ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=697; TBDR=19.47; Ms=230; Mu=96; IT=32; BT=1.32; GQ=S
14. Lorma 5: MI=F; ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=692; TBDR=19.46; Ms=274; Mu=108; IT=28; BT=1.40; GQ=G
15. Onebase 1.4: MI=F; ID=N; FR=G; TBCR=738; TBDR=17.76; Ms=251; Mu=93; IT=14; BT=2.04; GQ=S
16. PeanutPro: MI=U; ID=s; FR=F; TBCR=423; TBDR=19.80; Ms=311; Mu=138; IT=17; BT=1.37; GQ=F
17. Mandrake 10: MI=U; ID=N; FR=E; TBCR=891; TBDR=19.42; Ms=235; Mu=83; IT=22; BT=1.41; GQ=F
18. Knoppix 3.4: MI=F; ID=N; FR=F; TBCR=702; TBDR=2.73; Ms=263; Mu=176; IT=41; BT=1.53; GQ=S
19. PCLinux 2K4: MI=F; ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=736; TBDR=19.42; Ms=270; Mu=144; IT=21; BT=1.43; GQ=S
20. Mepis: MI=I; ID=s; FR=F; TBCR=804; TBDR=19.48; Ms=270; Mu=189; IT=34; BT=1.31; GQ=F
21. Asp.: MI=F; ID=s; FR=F; TBCR=612; TBDR=12.42; Ms=235; Mu=168; IT=54; BT=1.31; GQ=G
22. ArkH2o: MI=F; ID=s; FR=G; TBCR=817; TBDR=17.63; Ms=254; Mu=167; IT=39; BT=1.43; GQ=G
Final Notes:
YOPER Linux V2 (Prefinal) has proven itself to be the fastest and most nimble Linux distribution in the world, requiring the least expense of time for installation and boot time. It has also proven to have the smallest memory footprint of any major Linux distribution. The timing buffer cache reads exceed every other Linux distribution. The timing buffer disk reads is in the range of the fastest presently available.
Test Platform: IBM T-40 2373-72u / Pentium M Class x86 / 768 MB DDR memory
Test Environment: Full use of disk, 1 GB of swap
Test Basis: Base install as each developer group has chosen. With Debian and Slackware, bare minimum install with KDE.
Purpose: To determine which Linux distribution is the fastest and most efficient in the world.
Categories:
01. MI - Menu Intelligence = Intuitive / Functional / Unreasonable
02. ID - Install Difficulty = Advanced / Normal / Simple
03. FR - Font Rendering = Excellent / Good / Fair
04. TBCR - Timing Buffer Cache Reads
05. TBDR - Timing Buffer Disk Reads
06. Ms - Total Memory cached
07. Mu - Total User memory
08. IT- Install Time
09. BT - Boot Time
10. GQ - Graphical Quality = Superb / Good / Fair
==================================================
YOPER Linux V2 (Prefinal): MI=I; ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=1279.23; TBDR=19.49; Ms=219; Mu=66; IT=8; BT=0.56; GQ=G
01. Linspire: MI=I: ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=821.31; TBDR=12.74; Ms=258; Mu=102; IT=42; BT=1.48; GQ=S
02. SuSE 9.0: MI=F: ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=784.67; TBDR=14.83; Ms=312; Mu=168; IT=48; BT=2.15; GQ=S
03. SuSE 9.1: MI=F: ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=818; TBDR=14.21; Ms=326; Mu=181; IT=58; BT=1.4; GQ=S
04. DEB_3r2: MI=F: ID=A; FR=F; TBCR=623; TBDR=6.71; Ms=292; Mu=171; IT=25; BT=1.21; GQ=F
05. Fedora Core 2: MI=F; ID=N; FR=F; TBCR=581; TBDR=11.37; Ms=283; Mu=151; IT=57; BT=2.18; GQ=G
06. Xandros: MI=I; ID=s; FR=G; TBCR=823; TBDR=17.46; Ms=327; Mu=182; IT=31; BT=1.46; GQ=S
07. Slackware 10: MI=F; ID=A; FR=G; TBCR=756; TBDR=17.43; Ms=241; Mu=82; IT=46; BT=1.07; GQ=G
08. Aurox 9.4: MI=I; ID=N; FR=G; TBCR=684; TBDR=12.68; Ms=252; Mu=146; IT=33; BT=1.46; GQ=F
09. Connectiva 10: MI=I; ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=715; TBDR=19.01; Ms=346; Mu=181; IT=26; BT=1.10; GQ=S
10. BLAG: MI=I; ID=s; FR=G; TBCR=493; TBDR=19.75; Ms=224; Mu=111; IT=37; BT=1.56; GQ=G
11. Overclockix: MI=F; ID=N; FR=G; TBCR=635; TBDR=6.21; Ms=305; Mu=193; IT=16; BT=2.1; GQ=G
12. Munjoy: MI=F; ID=s; FR=G; TBCR=688.58; TBDR=19.41; Ms=192; Mu=82; IT=28; BT=2.13; GQ=G
13. LBA: MI=I; ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=697; TBDR=19.47; Ms=230; Mu=96; IT=32; BT=1.32; GQ=S
14. Lorma 5: MI=F; ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=692; TBDR=19.46; Ms=274; Mu=108; IT=28; BT=1.40; GQ=G
15. Onebase 1.4: MI=F; ID=N; FR=G; TBCR=738; TBDR=17.76; Ms=251; Mu=93; IT=14; BT=2.04; GQ=S
16. PeanutPro: MI=U; ID=s; FR=F; TBCR=423; TBDR=19.80; Ms=311; Mu=138; IT=17; BT=1.37; GQ=F
17. Mandrake 10: MI=U; ID=N; FR=E; TBCR=891; TBDR=19.42; Ms=235; Mu=83; IT=22; BT=1.41; GQ=F
18. Knoppix 3.4: MI=F; ID=N; FR=F; TBCR=702; TBDR=2.73; Ms=263; Mu=176; IT=41; BT=1.53; GQ=S
19. PCLinux 2K4: MI=F; ID=s; FR=E; TBCR=736; TBDR=19.42; Ms=270; Mu=144; IT=21; BT=1.43; GQ=S
20. Mepis: MI=I; ID=s; FR=F; TBCR=804; TBDR=19.48; Ms=270; Mu=189; IT=34; BT=1.31; GQ=F
21. Asp.: MI=F; ID=s; FR=F; TBCR=612; TBDR=12.42; Ms=235; Mu=168; IT=54; BT=1.31; GQ=G
22. ArkH2o: MI=F; ID=s; FR=G; TBCR=817; TBDR=17.63; Ms=254; Mu=167; IT=39; BT=1.43; GQ=G
Final Notes:
YOPER Linux V2 (Prefinal) has proven itself to be the fastest and most nimble Linux distribution in the world, requiring the least expense of time for installation and boot time. It has also proven to have the smallest memory footprint of any major Linux distribution. The timing buffer cache reads exceed every other Linux distribution. The timing buffer disk reads is in the range of the fastest presently available.
I thought that since Charlemagne spent so much time on this, I might spend a little bit of time to do a chart with a point system ![smile.gif]()
[*] http://www.yoper.com/comparison/desktopcomparison.html
and as OpenOffice Calc
[*] http://www.yoper.com/comparison/comparison.sxc
[*] http://www.yoper.com/comparison/desktopcomparison.html
and as OpenOffice Calc
[*] http://www.yoper.com/comparison/comparison.sxc
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2004 Invision Power Services, Inc.
Title: YOPER: Your Operating System > Test Speed comparison Speed Computations/Yoper/Linux Distros
Computations for Various Linux Distros.
a.mean disparity >1%
b. Equipment Used: IBM T-40 (2373-72u)
c Purpose: To establish, and standardise Linux System Performance.
d.Standard Format: "Out of the box", ie, dowmloadable iso 9660,or Purchased set.
e.Disclaimer: All testing was performed objectively, and repeatable.Due to the
fact all hardware is not equal, your results can vary.
f.Partitions: Full use of Disk, 700mb Swap.
g.Default Desktop used in every case, as designated by each Developer group.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yoper V2(pre2) -Install time 12min. /Sysmem-93/Usermem-184 /Timing buffer cache reads -1528mb:sec/Timing buffer disk reads-18.47mb:sec /Loading time-Moz-6.3sec/Loading time-Konq.-1.1sec.
Yoper Pre3 -install time 13min. /Sysmem-81/Usermem-265 /Timing buffer cache reads-1528mb:sec /Timing buffer disk reads-18.47mb:sec /Loading time-Moz-2.8sec /Loading time-Konq-.4sec.
Knoppix 3.4 (Installed to HD) - install time 41min. /Sysmem-84/Usermem-176 /Timing buffer cache reads-702mb:sec/Timing buffer disk reads-2.73mb:sec/Loading time-Moz-8.4sec /Loading time-Konq-4.1sec
PCLinuxos-2K4 - install time 21min./Sysmem-97/Usermem-144/Timing buffer cache reads-736mb:sec/Timing buffer disk reads-19.42mb:sec /Loading time-Moz-10.2sec./Loading time-Konq-2.8sec.
Mepis-5/09/2004Edition -install time 34min./Sysmem-81/Usermem-189/Timing buffer cache reads-804mb:sec /Timing buffer disk reads-19.48mb:sec/Loading time-Moz-8.5sec/Loading time-Konq-3.0sec.
Mandrake 10 Official -install time 22min,/Sysmem-68/Usermem-183/Timing buffer cache reads-891mb:sec/Timing buffer disk reads-18.44mb:sec/Loading time-Moz-5.7sec/Loading time-Konq-2.0sec
ASPlinux(Ural) -install time 54min,/Sysmem-67,Usermem-168/Timing buffer cache reads-612mb:sec./Timing buffer disk reads 12.42mb:sec/Loading time-Moz-15.1sec/Loading time-Konq-N/A/Loading time-Galeon-5.3sec.
Ark-H2o-alpha10- install time 39min/Sysmem-85/Usermem-167 /Timing buffer cache reads-817/Timing buffer disk reads-17.63/Loading time-Moz-7.3sec/Loading time-Konq-2.1sec.
Notes:
1.The pre3 Yoper had nearly double the throughput in the Timing buffer cache reads, of the nearest other Distro.
2.The pre3 Yoper had twice the desktop loading speed of the nearest other Distro.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendix:
Hdparm/Free-m/KDEsystemguard were used to cross reference results .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a.mean disparity >1%
b. Equipment Used: IBM T-40 (2373-72u)
c Purpose: To establish, and standardise Linux System Performance.
d.Standard Format: "Out of the box", ie, dowmloadable iso 9660,or Purchased set.
e.Disclaimer: All testing was performed objectively, and repeatable.Due to the
fact all hardware is not equal, your results can vary.
f.Partitions: Full use of Disk, 700mb Swap.
g.Default Desktop used in every case, as designated by each Developer group.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yoper V2(pre2) -Install time 12min. /Sysmem-93/Usermem-184 /Timing buffer cache reads -1528mb:sec/Timing buffer disk reads-18.47mb:sec /Loading time-Moz-6.3sec/Loading time-Konq.-1.1sec.
Yoper Pre3 -install time 13min. /Sysmem-81/Usermem-265 /Timing buffer cache reads-1528mb:sec /Timing buffer disk reads-18.47mb:sec /Loading time-Moz-2.8sec /Loading time-Konq-.4sec.
Knoppix 3.4 (Installed to HD) - install time 41min. /Sysmem-84/Usermem-176 /Timing buffer cache reads-702mb:sec/Timing buffer disk reads-2.73mb:sec/Loading time-Moz-8.4sec /Loading time-Konq-4.1sec
PCLinuxos-2K4 - install time 21min./Sysmem-97/Usermem-144/Timing buffer cache reads-736mb:sec/Timing buffer disk reads-19.42mb:sec /Loading time-Moz-10.2sec./Loading time-Konq-2.8sec.
Mepis-5/09/2004Edition -install time 34min./Sysmem-81/Usermem-189/Timing buffer cache reads-804mb:sec /Timing buffer disk reads-19.48mb:sec/Loading time-Moz-8.5sec/Loading time-Konq-3.0sec.
Mandrake 10 Official -install time 22min,/Sysmem-68/Usermem-183/Timing buffer cache reads-891mb:sec/Timing buffer disk reads-18.44mb:sec/Loading time-Moz-5.7sec/Loading time-Konq-2.0sec
ASPlinux(Ural) -install time 54min,/Sysmem-67,Usermem-168/Timing buffer cache reads-612mb:sec./Timing buffer disk reads 12.42mb:sec/Loading time-Moz-15.1sec/Loading time-Konq-N/A/Loading time-Galeon-5.3sec.
Ark-H2o-alpha10- install time 39min/Sysmem-85/Usermem-167 /Timing buffer cache reads-817/Timing buffer disk reads-17.63/Loading time-Moz-7.3sec/Loading time-Konq-2.1sec.
Notes:
1.The pre3 Yoper had nearly double the throughput in the Timing buffer cache reads, of the nearest other Distro.
2.The pre3 Yoper had twice the desktop loading speed of the nearest other Distro.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendix:
Hdparm/Free-m/KDEsystemguard were used to cross reference results .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intresting information charlemagne but my question is, can Yopper get any faster? How do you know when you have reaced optimal performance?
I would have like to have seen FC2 and SuSE 9.1 included in these tests. FC2 especially I have never used such a slow distro and was wondering if FC2 really does perform as badly as it did on my PC.
Anyway, good stuff. Thanks for the info![wink.gif]()
I would have like to have seen FC2 and SuSE 9.1 included in these tests. FC2 especially I have never used such a slow distro and was wondering if FC2 really does perform as badly as it did on my PC.
Anyway, good stuff. Thanks for the info
According to Andreas, yes. The performance patches upcoming (or maybe already incorporated) for the 2.6-7 kernel are supposed to be.
The Suse 9.1 via ftp, I ran some basic tests on , but not thoroughly enough.
I don't know if the b oxed set would be faster, but it was slow as molasses on the t40ibm machine.
The fedora core was also visibly slow, but not as severe as Suse. The Yast2
control suite would take like 8 seconds to load.
Heavy on the memory ,too.
It is 4 in the morning here, so I should give it a rest.
Best wishes-
The Suse 9.1 via ftp, I ran some basic tests on , but not thoroughly enough.
I don't know if the b oxed set would be faster, but it was slow as molasses on the t40ibm machine.
The fedora core was also visibly slow, but not as severe as Suse. The Yast2
control suite would take like 8 seconds to load.
Heavy on the memory ,too.
It is 4 in the morning here, so I should give it a rest.
Best wishes-
Its amazing that Yoper can get any faster. Well it is to me anyway. You have to understand I still use Windows at work and when I come home to see this type of speed is amazing. Plus the PC at work is a gig faster than mine lol.
Hmm, odd that SuSE 9.1 was slower than FC2. FC2 was really slow for me so I can't imagine SuSE. 8 seconds for yast? That is slow, I wonder why. I expected the latest SuSE to be faster. I guess SuSE has jumped on the MS train with the next release needing better hardware.
I *was* going to upgrade my 1.4Ghz AMD Athlon until I installed Yoper but now whats the point![wink.gif]()
Anyway you should get some sleep, if I was up until 4am it would kill me as I would only have two hours sleep lol.
Hmm, odd that SuSE 9.1 was slower than FC2. FC2 was really slow for me so I can't imagine SuSE. 8 seconds for yast? That is slow, I wonder why. I expected the latest SuSE to be faster. I guess SuSE has jumped on the MS train with the next release needing better hardware.
I *was* going to upgrade my 1.4Ghz AMD Athlon until I installed Yoper but now whats the point
Anyway you should get some sleep, if I was up until 4am it would kill me as I would only have two hours sleep lol.
Native Linux Threading Library might also make a huge difference. Might be part of the final. Threading ability is enhanced by at least 800 percent, yes at least ![smile.gif]()
... RedHat uses it, but somehow it all gets lost in their bloat.
Performance patches are also included in the latest 2.6.7 kernel I have uploaded and is available right now.
Even faster? Well at the stage of V2-final, I think the only way to get it faster is to compile it for Athlon or for P4 directly or to get a bigger system. The work involved is however not really my thing and I question the sense of making it even faster ....![smile.gif]()
Thanks a lot CharleMagne for the effort and long hours you put into these tests. Once the final comes out and those final tests, we can then see if we don't get the time to publicise this a little. Maybe even at release time mention, oh BTW ... V2 does this and this.
Once I have a new load of T-Shirts ..... I will gladly send you one .
Andreas
Performance patches are also included in the latest 2.6.7 kernel I have uploaded and is available right now.
Even faster? Well at the stage of V2-final, I think the only way to get it faster is to compile it for Athlon or for P4 directly or to get a bigger system. The work involved is however not really my thing and I question the sense of making it even faster ....
Thanks a lot CharleMagne for the effort and long hours you put into these tests. Once the final comes out and those final tests, we can then see if we don't get the time to publicise this a little. Maybe even at release time mention, oh BTW ... V2 does this and this.
Once I have a new load of T-Shirts ..... I will gladly send you one .
Andreas
I want this to be on top and read
[quote]I want this to be on top and read[/quote]
That'll be a possibility when I get the new forums running![wink.gif]()
That'll be a possibility when I get the new forums running
But that is a possibility now lol.
It sure is LOL
More Linux distribution comparisons upcoming next week-
Thanks to the developers for such a speedy system. Linux with
rocket fuel .!
Thanks to the developers for such a speedy system. Linux with
rocket fuel .!
[quote]But that is a possibility now lol.[/quote]
Using Stone Age ideas in the 21st century :roll:
Using Stone Age ideas in the 21st century :roll:
the speed acceleration of yoper doesnt suprise me a bit...
Most distris out ther are back-compatible to a toaster...
Even compiling a kernel for a specific CPU type doesnt get you much speed as long as you dont compile ALL the packages for your system!
I've tried Mandrake (i586) and Suse (i386) and its mostly true.
Yoper ist as far as I know the first linux that is designed fot the hardware sold today ( well.. that also means its not for a newbie to install!)
As allways:linux works fine with hardware that is 3-4 years old... to get it work with something new ist a hard work...
So far I got Ypoer to work on VMWare and I'm amazed! Speed ist great, and all other stuff I install by compiling it anyway! No need for thousands applications that no newbie finds in his KDE shortcut :-)
Great work :-)
Sebnastian
Most distris out ther are back-compatible to a toaster...
Even compiling a kernel for a specific CPU type doesnt get you much speed as long as you dont compile ALL the packages for your system!
I've tried Mandrake (i586) and Suse (i386) and its mostly true.
Yoper ist as far as I know the first linux that is designed fot the hardware sold today ( well.. that also means its not for a newbie to install!)
As allways:linux works fine with hardware that is 3-4 years old... to get it work with something new ist a hard work...
So far I got Ypoer to work on VMWare and I'm amazed! Speed ist great, and all other stuff I install by compiling it anyway! No need for thousands applications that no newbie finds in his KDE shortcut :-)
Great work :-)
Sebnastian
to be up the top ![smile.gif]()
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2004 Invision Power Services, Inc.
