the dolmetsch dictionary provides an explanation for "alphabeto" but
doesn't have anything listed for "monody." please, what's that? ... basso continuo for 5c. guitar?

No - monody is music consisting of a single melodic line. In the 17th Century Italian context it , means a solo song with some sort of accompaniment.

Apparently the term was coined by one Giovanni Battista Doni in the 1630s.

How does the Dolmetsch dictionary define alphabeto?

Monica

Monica Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: Monica Hall
To: Martyn Hodgson
Cc: vihuelalist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: tablature, alfabeto and BC


Well - the short answer is no!

The guitar does feature in the Florentine Intermedii. It is just possible that it was used in Landi's opera Sant Alessio as this includes a duet for the two humourous characters which is also included in one of Landi's song books with alfabeto.

It does make an appearance in Lully's La Galanterie du temps - played by Corbetta - but that is French. And of course in the music for Calisto again with Corbetta.

If it was used in Italian opera it would probably have been in very specific contexts - humorous, gipsies and the like I guess.

Not very helpful that...

Monica
----- Original Message ----- From: Martyn Hodgson
 To: Monica Hall ; Lex
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 2:44 PM
 Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: tablature, alfabeto and BC


 Monica,

Related to this: are you aware if any lists of players at the 17thC/early 18thC Italian Opera Houses listing theorbos, harpsichords players also showing guitarists.?

 Martyn

 Monica Hall  wrote:

   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: tablature, alfabeto and BC


   these are my thoughts ...

   >> Lex Eisenhardt wrote:
   >>
>> There is an interesting parallel to the rapid decline of alfabeto song
   >> after
>> 1630. At about the same time the first instructions appeared for the use
   >> of the guitar in BC (Foscarini, Corbetta).
   >> Should we suppose that the practice of an all-battuto (alfabeto)
   >> accompaniment style has survived?
   >> There are (almost) no books with alfabeto from any other country
>> than Italy, and the Italian alfabeto manuals from the second half of the >> 17th century are poor, rehashed versions of earlier editions, almost
   >> without
>> exception. They were only printed in Rome and Venice, probably in small >> numbers, serving a local demand. Alfabeto (in print) clearly was past its
   >> prime.
   >
The short answer to that is that what has survived in print is only a tip
   of the iceberg. And what is printed commercially reflects the economic
situation at the time and place. Italy was apparently in economic decline in the second half of the 17th century. Also it may have been that the kind of songs which are included in these books had gone out of fashion rather than the manner of accompanying them. Surely this same is true of the songs
   which don't have alfabeto?

And if you have been reading Cory Gavito's dissertation I wouldn't read too much into what he says as it is based on a very small statistical sample.

The exercises in the books by Corbetta et al include examples showing which alfabeto chords match the the notes of the bass part e.g. The Regola per sonar sopra la parte on p.70 on Corbetta's are surely intended to help the player devise a strummed accompaniment. It is also self-evident that the accompaniments to the vocal pieces in Corbetta's Guitarre royale of 1671 are intended to be mostly strummed. Why else should he put the note values on
   the stave rather than above it?

The same is true of Matteis - the first lesson which Schollars ought to learn by heart - simply the standard chords and some of his accompaniments
   and exercises are mostly strummed. that on p.23 for example.

>> However, some players may have been able to realize an accompaniment,
   >> departing from the bass (and losing considerably in volume, while
   >> plucking
   >> part of the harmonies).

   Of course but that doesn't mean that they didn't vary the kind of
   accompaniment which they provided.

   >>
>> Matteis (1680): 'The guitar was never so much in use & credit as it is at
   >> this day, & finding it improved to so great a perfection, it is my
   >> present
>> design to make it company for other Instruments. Every body knows it to
   >> be
>> an imperfect Instrument & yet finding upon experience how agreeable a
   >> part
   >> it bears in a consort I have composed severall Pieces both for ye
   >> practice
   >> &
>> information of those that would make use of it with ye Harpsichord, Lute,
   >> Theorbo or Bass-Viol.'
   >
Note that he suggests that it should be used with the bass viol amongst
   > other things.............
   >>
   >> Campion (1716): '.

   Campion is writing a whole generation after Corbetta...

   one is not prejudiced against the guitar without reason.
   >> I
>> acknowledge, along with everyone, that it is not as strong of harmony as
   >> the
>> harpsichord or the theorbo. However, I believe that it is sufficient to
   >> accompany one voice.'
   >
That is the point - the guitar is more suitable for accompanying the voice
   or in small groups. I would agree with Martin today that the guitar is
   often added to the continuo groups inappropriately.

   > I have even heard it included in Handel!
   >>
   >> They both did not include all-battuto accompaniments in their
   >> instructions, and the BC manuals from this time (Sanz, Grenerin, de
   >> Murcia)
   >> take the bass as the main reference.
   >
Murcia wasn't printed until 1714. The point is that they didn't need to include instructions on how to strum an accompaniment. Spaniards didn't need this kind of instruction. Their objective was something different. There are large numbers of manuscripts with Castilian or Catalan cifras.

Note also that the each of the tonos in the Cancionero de Marin is preceded by a note indicating the passacalles to be (presumably) strummed between the verses. If you have only seen the modern edition you may not be aware of
   that.
   >
   > It seems that using the guitar for
   >> plain battuto had become quite much a matter of genre, kept for old
   >> exotic
>> dances (ruggieros, ciacconas etc.) and a very specific (mainly archaic)
   >> song
   >> repertoire.
   >
   > I wonder if it did come to mind at all to add the strumming of
   >> a
>> guitar to ensemble performance. Just like this was not usual in Church
   >> music
>> (well, in Spain and South America of course they did...). There is a >> tantalizing lack of notated examples, eye-witness reports and iconography
   >> from the second half of the century, with regard to the role of the
   >> guitar
   >> in ensemble.
   >>
   >> Today it is often supposed that the guitar was added to
>> ensembles, for rhythm and colour, with reference to unwritten traditions.
   >> What solid historical information is there to support this?
   >
   This depends on how diligently you have searched the surviving
   documentation.

   Monica
   >
   >>
   >>
   >>
   >>
   >> To get on or off this list see list information at
   >> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >>
   >>
   >>
   >> ---------------------------------
   >> Sent from Yahoo! - a smarter inbox.
>> -- >
   >







------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Sent from Yahoo! - a smarter inbox.
--



http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=billkilpatrick

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Tryit now.
--



Reply via email to