> The completion stuff already is very complicated. Adding fancy things > is going to take lots of time and introduce new bugs. > > Allowing duplicate entries is not that difficult. Perhaps adding an > item to the dictionary for this is sufficient. Let's use "dup" for > that. >
I would assume that removing the dup checking would simplify the completion code on your end, but however you want to implement is fine by me, just as long as plugin developers have the flexibility. thanks again for your time on this. -- eric
