A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> Yes, I never said anything else: "...the scripts... terminate early
> and with error...". It surprised me because, after all, Vim doesn't
> need to be a C compiler to run ccomplete.vim, or a Web browser (hiding
> tags, the whole <HEAD> part, and OTOH showing clickable <A HREF=...>
> links and graphical <IMG> pictures) to use htmlcomplete.vim. Executing
> a script and editing it are two different things.
My other message covered the reason for the requirement. C as a language
does not provide introspection, python and ruby do. The most effective
completion (for ruby) comes from asking the ruby interpreter itself
"what do you know about X". I will probably add a fail-over to syntax
completion as someone else mentioned. I wonder how microsoft manages
their completion system, I'm of the belief that they are also using
introspection (probably in some sort of sandbox).

It would be nice if I could access the spelling/underlining stuff to
provide syntax error information. I haven't look too hard yet to see if
this is possible, but I for one would find it useful.

> P.S. Is that really your mail address? Looks bogus to me. But then if
> it were, you shouldn't stay long on the mailing list...
Yes, it is indeed my email address, though I have a few aliases that are
a bit more "formal". I am quite the trouble maker. I'm sure you can
imagine that my address does not validate on many websites, apparently
.info domains aren't valid in most peoples eyes.
  --mark


-- 
sic transit gloria et adulescentia 
blog | http://blog.hasno.info/blog
wiki | http://wiki.hasno.info

Reply via email to