Martin Stubenschrott wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 01:12:00AM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > > Hope that gets added to the default vim 7.1 distribution, because it's
> > > quite the best working omni complete script I have seen so far.
> >
> > Can you mention on what points cppcomplete.vim works better than the
> > ccomplete.vim scripts?
> >
> > If it's overal better I can replace the script.
>
> First, it checks return types of functsion (where possible).
> Lets assume this C code:
> --------------------
> typedef struct POINT
> {
> int x;
> float y;
> } _POINT;
>
>
> POINT func()
> {
> // POINT foo = ...
> return foo;
> }
>
> int main()
> {
> func().<c-x><x-o>
> }
> -------------------
> cppcomplete lists me:
> x and y as members since func() returns a struct of type POINT.
>
> ccomplete does nothing but searching for a long time. I have a 125MB
> tags file in /usr/include with --foldcase, but cppcomplete is instant,
> and ccomplete takes some seconds, and still doesn't find something.
>
> Second, I am not sure, if ccomplete can follow typedefs, cppcomplete can.
>
> These are my main 2 concerns, and probably a unified codebase for c/c++
> completion is easier to maintain. But I have not worked with ccomplete
> that much, so please check, if cppcomplete also works for your usage
> szenarios when coding C.
OK.
Which script are you talking about exactly? There are four script
matches for "cppcomplete" on www.vim.org.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
65. The last time you looked at the clock it was 11:30pm, and in what
seems like only a few seconds later, your sister runs past you to
catch her 7am school bus.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
