On 2/24/07, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - char_u di_key[1]; /* key (actually longer!) */ > + char_u di_key[]; /* key (actually longer!) */
I think this is c99 vs c89 difference. C99 allows x[] as last member of the struct, but c89 does not. As Bram mentioned, vim is written in c89, not c99.
This won't work for standard C compilers, they will complain about unkown size for di_key. The problem is in the compiler, so fix the compiler. Or perhaps there is a way to silence the compiler?
Yakov
