The ?/a/b/c solution is really cool. I have had this question in my mind for a very long time and I cant believe I could not think of this ultra simple solution...!
Thanks! A.J.Mechelynck wrote: > > Tim Chase wrote: >>>> To search the string say /a/b/c/d/e/f/g/h/i in a file, is there a way >>>> to do >>>> it without going to each / and escaping it to \/ >>> >>> :let @/ = escape('string with /slashes/, \backslashes\, .periods., >>> *asterisks* etc.', '/\.*') >>> >>> n >> >> >> Building on Tony's good suggestion...it's a good one, and an >> aircraft-carrier of a solution, swatting many more problems that are >> possible to arise, scaling to a full assault on the problem that >> consists of arbitrary escaping of any metacharacter. > > Thanks for the compliment, Tim, but don't overdo it, you're making me > blush. ;-) > >> >> However, if you want to *just* include forward-slashes, you can search >> *backwards* for them, and then reverse your direction: >> >> ?/a/b/c/d/e/f/g/h/i >> N >> >> A slightly lazier way to do it with far less typing. :) >> >> Or a hybrid approach: >> >> :let @/='/a/b/c/d/e/f/g/h/i' >> n >> >> Once you've done either my first suggestion, you can use the regular "/" >> command and then use control+P to bring up the last >> search...magicomysteriously pre-escaped for you. :) This makes it handy >> to reverse the direction/meaning of n/N for future searches. I'm not >> sure why the second variant doesn't get remembered in the search history. >> >> -tim > > In the second variant you don't use a search command (like / ? or :s) > but an arithmetic evaluation command. Then n does search, but _it_ > doesn't change the latest search pattern. Don't know if the fact that > ":let @/" doesn't alter search history must be regarded as a bug, a > feature, or a legacy "thing that we don't particularly like but have to > live with". > > Your solution is a good one too, and more economical than mine if only / > is of concern. For some reason I hadn't realised (or remembered) that > you can use unescaped / in a ? search. > > > > Best regards, > Tony. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/search-a-b-c-d-e-in-a-file-tf2093687.html#a5772460 Sent from the Vim - General forum at Nabble.com.