On 2006-08-31, Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> > And 'vim -u NONE' doesn't work for you?
>
> alias vi='vim -u NONE'
>
> OK. That works. Can't that be done with something a little more
> obvious in ~/.vimrc ?? So, I'll burn that in my brain and not be
> bothered anymore. Thank you all. Bruce
I was just looking through ":help starting.txt" and it seems to me
that putting
set all&
set compatible
set noloadplugins
filetype off
at the very start of your ~/.vimrc or ~/.exrc ought to give you as
basic a vi as you can get from vim, even if a system vimrc has
already been sourced.
I'm not sure about the proper ordering of those first two, or if it
makes a difference.
HTH,
Gary
--
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Wireless Division
| Spokane, Washington, USA
