Tim Chase wrote:
> >> If this is not the case, the help for \%[] may likely intend to
> >> refer to "ordinary atoms" rather than "atoms".
> >>
> >> *However*, the above search/match expression returns an "E369:
> >> invalid item in \%[]" error.
> >>
> >> I get this both in vim6.3 and vim7.
> >
> > The documentation omits to mention that \(\) things are not allowed
> > inside \%[]. It also doesn't nest.
>
> So should the documentation for \%[] be updated to read "ordinary
> atoms" rather than "atoms" then? Or are there additional items
> that can go in a \%[] that are some subset of "atom" but a
> superset of "ordinary atoms"?
All atoms can be used except \(\), \%(\), \z(\) and \%[]. Basically
things that nest.
--
We do not stumble over mountains, but over molehills.
Confucius
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
