From: "Yakov Lerner", Fri, September 29, 2006 3:43 pm
> On 9/29/06, Steve Hall wrote
> > From: "Yakov Lerner", Fri, September 29, 2006 2:24 pm
> > >
> > > There must have been reason for this ("linebreak ... is not used
> > > when...'list' is on").
> > >
> > > Is it because with list on, representation of tabs can be
> > > different/incorrect from "correct" representation, and visual
> > > line length will be incorrect ?
> >
> > I'd say this should only be the case if &list's tab representation
> > differs (is only one char) from &tabstop, but otherwise it
> > shouldn't.
>
> That's right wrt visual line lengths.
> Going back to the "fix linebreak when list is on":
>
> (a) would it be good enough to fix it for the case
> when &list tab's representation is same as 'nolist' ?
> (i think this case is very easy to fix ), or
>
> (b) you want it fixed for both cases, also when
> "&list's tab representation differs (is only one char) from
> &tabstop" ?
> (the (b) case must be more difficult) ?
>
> So, did you mean (a) fix or (b) fix ?
I'm only interested in (a). However, I imagine there would be enough
opinions on fixing (b) here to have to provide a new option. :)
--
Steve Hall [ digitect dancingpaper com ]
