Hi Hari, On 10/11/06, Hari Krishna Dara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have observed this sometime back, but forgot to bring this up here (actually brought it up in another topic, but nobody was interested). I just got the below error: rror detected while processing function <SNR>84_Tab..<SNR>84_Arrow..<SNR>84_NextField..<SNR>84_MoveToField..359..358..357: line 10: E116: Invalid arguments for function 353 How the heck am I supposed to understand which function this is? I requested earlier that the :function command consider numbered functions as well (both in the list of functions and to list function body). This will allow me to at least see the contents of function 353 and deduce the name. Ideally, the function() function should accept numbered functions, and return a Funcref, and Funcrefs should know what the original name was. As a temporary workaround, I can echo it to see which field has this numbered function, but for a script-local functions, I have to put a breakpoint in the script to be able to access the dictionary. I quickly adapted to the dict functions and so far am happy with general advantages it gives by the partial OO style coding you can do, but this is quickly becoming a big pain. Imagine setting breakpoints for these function. Luckily, I am able to use my BPBreak*() functions from breakpts.vim to set them at runtime. I hope Bram will not take my pain lightly, just because I am the only one seriously using them right now.
I agree. I am developing a tree control using a dictionary. I am also facing the above problems with the numbered Vim functions. - Yegappan
