Suresh Govindachar wrote:
>
> Tony wrote:
> >Suresh Govindachar wrote:
> >>
> >> Solved with help from Brian Dessent on the MinGW mailing list.
> >>
> >> Add -lperl58 at the very end (location matters) of the last command.
> >>
> >> --Suresh
> >
> > This is understandable by assuming that the linker processes
> > each object file or library once, in the order seen on the
> > command line. Then any symbols unsatisfied so far will be looked
> > for in the next lib at each step: and this implies that a symbol
> > invoked only by a later lib won't be searched again in an
> > earlier lib (unless, of course, its name is repeated further
> > on).
>
> Not really -- for a build with dynamic support, there should not
> be any need to add -lperl58. There is a shortcoming in if_perl.xs
> (mentioned in another theread) that prevents the building of vim
> with dynamic support for newer releases of ActivePerl perl.
>
> --Suresh
My explanation was about "location matters", not about "lperl58 is required".
Best regards,
Tony.
--
Bride, n.:
A woman with a fine prospect of happiness behind her.
-- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
