Tony asked: > Suresh Govindachar wrote: >> >> + #if (ACTIVEPERL_VERSION >= 822) >> + # define PERL589_OR_LATER >> + #endif >> + #if (PERL_REVISION == 5) && (PERL_VERSION == 8) && (PERL_SUBVERSION >= 9) >> + # define PERL589_OR_LATER >> + #endif >> + #if (PERL_REVISION == 5) && (PERL_VERSION >= 10) > > -------------------------------------------------^ > shouldn't this be (PERL_VERSION >= 9)? > Otherwise Perl 5.9.x won't be regarded as "5.8.9 or later" Good catch but I think there is something about perl's version's middle number being even always. Or it is the case that there will not be any 5.9 at all.
(I heard that both 5.8.9 and 5.10 are expected in a few months http://www.slideshare.net/acme/whats-new-in-perl-510 .) --Suresh --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
