Philip Prindeville wrote:
> This is simple enough: suppress the detecting of /usr/local and > putting it into the load path (etc) if we're cross-compiling. > > Please review this and if it looks reasonable, signal to whomever to > commit it to the source tree (as a patch, obviously) or cast a > positive vote or whatever is necessary to bless it and assure its > commission. > > I sent it out-of-band a couple of times to Bram but it hasn't been > approved (or rejected for that matter), so I figure I should be > sending it to someone else (but don't know who that would be). The reason you don't hear from me is that most of my emails to you bounce back. What I tried to say: excluding /usr/local/[include|lib] is not specific for cross compiling. This should be a separate setting. Then it can also be set for cross compiling. Most configure features are explained in the Makefile. Or in the INSTALL file. I prefer the Makefile, there you can uncomment a line to have it used, no need to type it (configure doesn't warn for unrecognized arguments). -- Michael: There is no such thing as a dump question. Bernard: Sure there is. For example "what is a core dump?" /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
